In an indication that the FDA has perpetrated the greatest fraud upon the American public in history, the FDA’s own website which says that Ivermectin is not “effective against COVID” links to multiple science which says exactly the opposite. The evidence is sufficient for a strong criminal prosecution against, at a minimum, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the FDA.
The discovery takes place as the newsletter for the Kaiser health system reports an influx of non-COVID patients with “heart conditions” and “blood clots,” which have been associated with the Pfizer/Moderna mRNA injections. Taiwan, Germany, and France have all placed restrictions on the injections for younger age groups.
Although the links for the individual studies on Ivermectin at the FDA website go only to the study protocols, the studies may be researched by title and the full studies found.
“Clinical Trials” page link on FDA Ivermectin page (PDF archive of “Clinical Trials” page as it appeared on Nov. 11, 2021)
Below: From FDA Ivermectin page, Nov. 11, 2021
Below: Image of page which comes up when “Clinical Trials” is clicked on FDA Ivermectin page
The studies range in date from mid-2020 into mid-2021, as the FDA and Dr. Fauci maintain their hard positions against using Ivermectin in any way for COVID. Meanwhile, thousands of mostly elderly have died for lack of treatment.
Although overwhelming science has been cataloged which shows Ivermectin reduces COVID mortality by as much as 80%, no US or any other media outlet has bothered to mention that many of the studies are pinned to the FDA’s own webpage. Instead, the media picks up on the false implication, made recently that Ivermectin is only for livestock.
Below: FDA tweet on Ivermectin
Ivermectin is a Nobel Prize-winning drug which has been in use for humans for various ailments, for decades, and has a sterling safety record. Declines in COVID mortality on the order of 80% would have meant no pandemic.
Federal Judge Slaps Down Biden Vax Mandate, Taiwan Stops Child Pfizer Injections Over Heart Inflammation
Following are the conclusions of the studies listed in the FDA list of sources for its own position. However the linked studies do not support that position, that “available data do not show Ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.” The linked studies support the opposite. Presently there are 81 studies listed, but only a handful have “results available.” The ones that do all show that Ivermectin works, a sampling below.
Again, lest charges of “misinformation” lie waiting in the wings, in the following section these studies are all referenced by the FDA’s own website.
- “Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients”
Conclusion: “According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.”
2. “The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients with non-severe COVID-19: A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial”
Conclusion: “The positive signal found in this pilot warrants the conduction of larger trials using ivermectin for the early treatment of COVID-19.Such trials should include patients with risk factors for severe diseaseas well as patients with pneumonia. The potential for a mechanism of action different to direct antiviral effect also opens the door for preexposure prophylaxis in high-risk groups.”
Conclusion: “we consider IDEA protocol to be a scientifically based, low-cost treatment and sustainable healthcare strategy with a favorable benefit-risk ratio, based on the results reported in this article: reduction in overall mortality to one fourth, reduction in mortality of hospitalized patients to one eighth and no progression of mild cases to moderate or severe cases.”
Conclusion: “Ivermectin is suggested to be a promising effective chemoprophylactic drug against COVID-19. Ivermectin is inexpensive, available and quite safe drug. As this is the ﬁrst report regarding use of ivermectin in COVID-19 prophylaxis, it is very appropriate to promptly and rigorously study this drug further.”
Conclusion: “The mean time to stay in the hospital was significantly lower in IVM group compared with the controls…Add-on use of IVM to HCQ and AZT had better effectiveness, shorter hospital stay, and relatively safe compared with controls. however, a larger prospective study with longer follow up may be needed to validate these results.”
“Close to 70 clinical trials are currently in progress worldwide for SARS-CoV-2. Although few of these studies have been completed, the results that are available, as well as those from observational/retrospective studies, indicate clinical benefit.”
Strongest Evidence Yet of Criminal Fraud
The deliberate, coordinated suppression of cheap and effective remedies for COVID over the last year and a half has, rather than stay buried as some might prefer, continued to rear its ugly head. In November, the inventor of the technology on which the Pfizer and Moderna injections are based, mRNA gene manipulation, said that “Tony” Fauci was responsible for:
“over half a million deaths in the United States for this virus, completely unnecessary because the federal government has very actively blocked the ability of physicians to provide lifesaving medications early in the infection. “
Below: Inventor of mRNA Vaccine Tech: Fauci Directly Responsible for 500,000 “Unnecessary” COVID Deaths (View at Bitchute)
Also in November, medical choice activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. released his long-awaited book which has already shot to the top of the charts, “The Real Anthony Fauci.” The book is a damning indictment of Fauci’s career and present role as the nation’ top health advisor. In particular, the book details previous patterns of suppressing information and remedies in order to advance the agenda of Big Pharma.
Since last year, legions of doctors and scientists have been pointing to the scientific evidence that Ivermectin works, such as that compiled at IVMMeta.com
Undisputed success stories continue to emanate from countries such as Mexico and India. In India, physicians and the Indian Bar Association have filed a lawsuit against WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin. The legal notice filed by the IBA states:
“It is amply clear that your criminal mind is working swiftly to…cause as much possible damage to people and to stop the use of ‘Ivermectin’…” (LEGAL NOTICE)
In a study published at the NIH repository, Ivermectin is possibly effective against COVID mutant strains as well. In “Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19,” the authors write:
“The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.”
However, currently, any suggestion that Ivermectin is effective, is bashed down by Facebook, Big Tech, and the media with charges of “misinformation.” At Methodist Hospital in Houston, a doctor has been suspended after successfully treating her COVID patients with a range of treatments, including Ivermectin.
Rarely has information which upsets the narrative of government authorities come so conveniently from the government itself.
Thus the FDA’s blanket statement on its Ivermectin webpage, “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19,” is a polar, direct inversion of the truth, easily provable in any curt of law.
This is the strongest evidence yet that fraud has been perpetrated on the American public, with the intention of framing the currently still-experimental COVID Pfizer and Moderna injections as salvation.
Below: Press Conference by Houston Methodist Hospital doctor suspended for positive Twitter remarks on Ivermectin as treatment for COVID (View at Bitchute)
Below: Article by The American Association for the Advancement of Science on Navarro, Spain study, linked in FDA sources on Ivermectin
Read next article…
Here is Bill Gates’ Vaccine Biochip and Enslavement Platform, for Those Who Think it is Conspiracy Theory
To no outcry and the tacit approval of other world governments, and perhaps an indicator of what they have in store for their own people, Austria has become the first nation in history to impose a general lockdown on citizens who refuse to submit to injections of experimental substances. This is despite the clear and present danger presented by possibly “hundreds of thousands” of deaths caused by the so-called “vaccines,” according to a study in the peer-reviewed science journal Toxicology Reports. Many doctors and scientists dispute the description “vaccine.” (See: Toxicology Reports, volume 8, 2021)
The injections, made by for-profit corporations, are being aggressively pushed long before long-term safety trials are concluded, and even though Moderna and Pfizer themselves warn, in their “Fact Sheets,” that “many” people who have certain allergies and conditions should not have them.
When the media and FDA engage in the clear and blatant lie that Ivermectin is only “horse dewormer,” despite it being a Nobel Prize-winning human drug, there is the possibility, any rational thinker must admit, that some other agenda is in play. Why would the major media, government, and medical authorities join in a coordinated campaign, all using the same language, to repeat something so obviously, patently untrue?
In 1976 the Swine Flu vaccine program was halted after just 25 unexplained deaths, after being administered to 40 million Americans.
This is not typical government behavior or caution in the drug arena, nevermind for a 99.98% recovery rate virus for people under age 50, and 99.8% overall. Flu is 99.9% overall. A tremendous push is on to get everyone who travels on public transportation, or shops in public grocery stores, to roll up their sleeves.
Above chart source: Bloomberg News
The hammer blow to the rights of otherwise ordinary citizens in Austria comes as other nations like Taiwan, Germany, and France halt injections for younger people out of concerns over myocaditis (heart inflammation.) But this is only after hundreds of millions of people have already been injected, the words “safe and effective” ringing in their ears.
The Taiwan News reported in November 2021:
“TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) head Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) said on Wednesday (Nov. 10) that a panel of experts has decided to suspend administering second doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT) COVID vaccine to children 12-17 years old amid concerns it may increase the risk of myocarditis.”
The potential for serious, lifelong damage, specifically to the heart, has been well-known by scientists who were branded as “conspiracy theorists” by media like the New York Times, Reuters, AP, and USA Today. Alone among the major media, the Wall Street Journal allowed two top scientists to give their warning, that both the Pfizer and Moderna shots, which use the same mRNA technology, showed a “large clustering of certain adverse events immediately after vaccination,” which included “heart inflammation,” “thrombosis,” and “death.”
In June 2021 Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, and Professor Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD, Yale School of Public Health, wrote in the Wall Street Journal:
“Four serious adverse events follow this arc, according to data taken directly from Vaers: low platelets (thrombocytopenia); noninfectious myocarditis, or heart inflammation, especially for those under 30; deep-vein thrombosis; and death.”
“ …the large clustering of certain adverse events immediately after vaccination is concerning, and the silence around these potential signals of harm reflects the politics surrounding Covid-19 vaccines. Stigmatizing such concerns is bad for scientific integrity and could harm patients.”
Yet despite risks being serious enough to halt the injections in numerous countries, the Austrian government grinds its citizens into the dirt, for “societal safety,” in the words of Anthony Fauci. Fauci caused an uproar when he said of the choice to submit to the Pfizer/Moderna injections: “There is a misplaced perception about people’s individual right to make a decision that supersedes the societal safety.” Fauci thus equated “societal safety” with willingness to submit to experimental substances currently still in Phase III human safety trials, after skipping the normal three to six years of animal trials before human testing.
Pfizer and Moderna Phase III human clinical trials are not scheduled to be complete until the end of 2022, at the earliest. FDA evaluation of the full data then normally determines approval. The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to general use is 10 years.
Many scientists and doctors have said that, even by early this year, many “signals” were present which demanded that mass vaccinations be stopped, such as the number of CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System reports (VAERS) of unexplained deaths following soon after the injections. Presently the number of reported, possibly linked deaths for the COVID shots is over three times the number of death reports for all other vaccines combined, since 1990.
Below: Number of death reports to VAERS for COVID vaccines, (spike at right) compared to yearly reported deaths associated with all other vaccines combined. (CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE)
The End Game Comes Into Focus
In 2013 Klaus Schwab wrote in his book “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”:
“Any package, pallet or container can now be equipped with a sensor, transmitter or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag that allows a company to track where it is as it moves through the supply chain—how it is performing, how it is being used, and so on….In the near future, similar monitoring systems will also be applied to the movement and tracking of people.”
The author, Schwab, is not some ordinary mad professor engaging in random musings. He is the founder and president of the World Economic Forum, a private billionaires’ club with a budget of $300 million, which hosts an annual meeting of the world’s richest and most powerful men, who arrive in Davos, Switzerland, in swarms of private jets.
Below: Bill Gates arriving at 2019 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland
Below: World Economic Forum tweet of Bill Gates article in May 2020 pushing COVID vaccine
What is discussed in Davos can be seen taking shape right now. Today. And it all hinges on mandatory access to every human’s body under the guise of vaccination. No vaccine mandates, no biometric IDs (i.e. “vaccine passports.) No vaccine passports, no total control.
While there is an online cottage industry devoted to “debunking” “conspiracy theories” such as that Bill Gates wants to implement mass surveillance or microchipping of people, documents such as the government’s “Chinese Tech Landscape Overview” from May 2019 point to a desire on the part of the government to do exactly this.
In the the US government document “Chinese Tech Landscape Overview,” the writers seem to lament that everyone has these artificial surveillance platforms all wrong:
“In the press and politics of America and Europe, Al is painted as something to be feared that is eroding privacy and stealing jobs. Conversely, China views it as both a tool for solving major macroeconomic challenges in order to sustain their economic miracle, and an opportunity to take technological leadership on the global stage.” (See Whitney Webb: “Techno-Tyranny: How The US National Security State Is Using Coronavirus To Fulfill An Orwellian Vision”)
Below: USA Today “Fact Check”
Not a Conspiracy Theory, Real Technology
Conspiracy theory? A Silicon Valley company, Profusa, with funding from the US Defense Department’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA,) is expecting approval of an injectable, permanent under-the-skin biochip sensor made of advanced hydrogel material.
The existence of such a biochip was confirmed on 60 Minutes in April 2021, after a year of mockery of the idea as conspiracy theory.
The chip is being touted as a way to detect COVID infections as soon as the body begins to show symptoms.
Defense One, a defense industry trade website, writes in “A Military-Funded Biosensor Could Be the Future of Pandemic Detection.”
“Why are pandemics so hard to stop? Often it’s because the disease moves faster than people can be tested for it. The Defense Department is helping to fund a new study to determine whether an under-the-skin biosensor can help trackers keep up — by detecting flu-like infections even before their symptoms begin to show. Its maker, Profusa, says the sensor is on track to try for FDA approval by early next year.”
Below: Image of under-the-skin sensor made by Profusa (source)
According to a Profusa press release the biosensor is:
“Inserted under the skin with a syringe, the string includes a specially engineered molecule that sends a fluorescent signal outside of the body when the body begins to fight an infection….”
Once implanted the chip is permanent, fusing with living tissue and blood vessels:
“Smaller than a grain of rice, each biosensor is a flexible fiber about 5 mm long and half a millimeter wide, comprised of a porous scaffold that induces capillary and cellular ingrowth from surrounding tissue…The data is relayed to a smart phone for an encrypted personal record and historical tracking. Data can be shared securely via digital networks with healthcare providers.”
This wording should be terrifying to any free human being.
Critics of the technology, such as Dr. Carrie Madej, assert that such chips threaten to usher in a total control platform which links humans to a massive artificial intelligence network, which can track and read every facet of a person’s life, including mood, fear, anxiety, even level of sexual activity, by detecting and reading the body’s complex chemistry at all times.
A key director of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Dan Wattendorf, comes from a military background at DARPA. Wattendorf oversees the foundation’s strategy to develop and implement “new biomarkers.”
DARPA is a “partner” of Profusa, which received DARPA funds at its inception.
A related technology, directly funded by Gates, is the “quantum-dot tattoo,” a kind of barcode which contains patient records, and permanent ID.
Below: Image from Rice University News: “Quantum-dot tattoos hold vaccination record”
Gates Foundation Funded Imperial College Professor Neil Ferguson in April 2020, Whose Paper Brought Worldwide Lockdowns
Unreported in the media, it is a fantastic coincidence that Bill Gates gave nearly $8 million to Imperial College’s Professor Neil Ferguson, author of the discredited report which forecast over 2 million dead in 2020, in the US, if it did not lock down. The report was released just as the pandemic began, at a critical moment in April 2020. The report is entitled “Report 9 – Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand”
Gates largess to Imperial College also included a separate, unrelated grant of $79 million in March.
The National Review says of Ferguson:
“Johan Giesecke, the former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, has called Ferguson’s model “the most influential scientific paper” in memory. He also says it was, sadly, “one of the most wrong.”
Dr. Jay Schnitzer of the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center in San Diego put it even more bluntly:
“I’m normally reluctant to say this about a scientist, but he dances on the edge of being a publicity-seeking charlatan.”
One of Ferguson’s fiercest critics, a former Chief Science Officer and VP for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, told an interviewer:
“It’s important that you know most scientists don’t accept that it [Ferguson’s model] was even faintly right…but the government is still wedded to the model.”
Yet Ferguson’s views prevailed, and lockdowns threw the world into economic and social misery over COVID, a 99.98% recovery virus for people under 50.
Without lockdowns, there would have been no impetus for the unprecedented approval of novel, mRNA spike protein injections, long before their Phase III human clinical trials are complete, which will not be until the end of 2022, at the earliest.
And without a new, worldwide, mandatory injection regime, there would be no way into the body of every human, on a regular basis, who does not travel in private jets, who shop in public supermarkets. There would be no way to rationalize “vaccine passports,” which would link to a global database which contain all personal, financial, biometric, and geospatial information. A tyrant’s dream, made possible by technology being perfected in real-time today.
This was precisely the prediction of former Bush Sr. administration Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Catherine Austin Fitts. Since the start of the universal COVID vaccine drive, Fitts predicted that what elites really wanted was a universal tracking and surveillance system which could deliver rewards and punishments for social behaviors, such as “spreading misinformation.”
One element of the new system, sometimes called “The Great Reset,” would be the elimination of all cash in favor of a centralized, digital currency, which could be dipped into or cut-off completely by governments or supra-national entities.
The technology is already being developed, and at the center of it is Bill Gates. Gates is founder and funder of the GAVI Alliance, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization.
One of GAVI’s partner is Mastercard. A page at the GAVI website reads:
“…Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance – leading partner and catalyst, and Mastercard acting in the capacity of technology partner – have embarked in a Public Private Partnership aiming at deploying the Mastercard Wellness Pass…Mastercard is a technology company in the global payments industry committed to leading the way toward a World Beyond Cash.”
Former Ronald Reagan Assistant Secretary of the Treasury and a senior editor at the Wall Street Journal, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, has called Bill and Melinda Gates “the worse threat faced by human health and human freedom.”
A Mandatory Biochip Can Work Hand-in-Hand with Other Gates-Backed Technologies.
The Gates Foundation has funded the initiative the “Decade of Vaccines.” One of the talents tapped by Gates for the initiative is Dr. Anthony Fauci, with whom it is reported he consults with regularly.
Gates is a college drop-out and does not hold any medical or science degree of any kind.
“eventually there will be sort of this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global re-opening up.”
Gates on Universal Digital IDs Justified by Need to Confirm Vaccine Status (View at Bitchute)
Remarkably, as far back as April 2020, when nearly nothing was known about COVID or the pandemic, Gates was already calling “for the use of digital identity to support lockdown exit strategies, via digital certificates to indicate who has been tested, recovered, or been administered with any eventual vaccine.”
Prashant Yadav, a senior fellow at the US-based Center for Global Development said:
“Biometric digital IDs can be a gamechanger. They can help governments target population segments, verify people who have received vaccination, and have a clear record.”
Artificial Intelligence Platform Connected to Each Human
With every non-elite human tagged with a “biometric digital ID,” the remaining task would be to tie them all into one system, and exploit them. Gates’s Microsoft has taken an early lead in patents which would be able to “mine” bits of digital currency from humans linked to an artificial intelligence platform, connected by 5G.
PC Magazine writes:
“the human user would need to have a sensor attached to, or installed in, their body. Microsoft envisages users being rewarded for allowing their bodies to be monitored in this way by paying them in cryptocurrency for performing specific tasks.”
In what should qualify as proof of intent to enslave humanity at a Nuremberg 2.0. PC Magazine writes:
“As well as brain waves and heat, the patent also suggests using “body fluid flow” and “organ activity and movement” to track a range of tasks…”
It would not be the human’s choice to be connected to the 5G network.
And if one can be “rewarded” for good behaviors, they can be punished for bad behaviors, such as breaking curfew by leaving home, which the system will know through geospatial tracking. The nephew of the slain president, environmental lawyer and activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discusses this in the below interview with London Real.
Nephew of President JFK, Safe Vaccine Activist Calls Out Bill Gates Plan for 5G Control of Masses (View at Bitchute)
Kennedy spoke last year at a massive anti-totalitarianism demonstration in Berlin.
As if all this nightmarish ultimate control technology were not bad enough, there is the rapid development of in-body nanoparticles, now aimed at building “super-soldiers.” Although in the history of experimenting on soldiers, the well-being of the actual soldier has never been a consideration.
Adam Keiper, Senior Editor of The New Atlantis, write that:
“Nanotechnology could theoretically be used to make mind-control systems, invisible and mobile eavesdropping devices, or unimaginably horrific tools of torture.”
RFK Jr. says: “It would be the end of dissent.”
Global Real-Time Video Satellite Surveillance –
Finally, a group of wealthy investors led by Bill Gates have plans to blanket the globe with real-time satellite surveillance. With the use of facial recognition technology already deployed in China, all privacy and freedom of movement will be gone.
Newsweek in: “Bill Gates and Other Rich Investors Want to Watch Over Earth from Space” writes:
“Will Big Brother be something out of this world? A company called EarthNow, whose investors include Bill Gates, tech mogul Greg Wyler and companies like Airbus and SoftBank Group, announced this week that it has plans to launch a “large constellation of advanced imaging satellites” to provide real-time images of “almost anywhere on Earth.””
Is It Really All About Gates?
It would be absurd to say that Gates is a single madman who wants to rule the world. Others in his elite with similar power could stop him if they wanted to.
It would be more reasonable to say he is a front man of sorts. Acting with the approval of key members of his class. Of particular interest are two of the world’s largest asset management firms, BlackRock and Vanguard, which are in turn controlled by a small number of families, primary among them the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and the Bushes.
These firms essentially own and control the major media, the cooperation of which is essential in constantly fear-mongering and propagandizing the American public.
These media include the new York Times, Time Warner, Comcast, and Disney. Comcast owns NBC.
Gates is an imperfect frontman, as he has blood on his hands. In India, a committee of investigation found that thousands of girls, whose families were illiterate, were maimed by his vaccine trials. (See: “Bill Gates Agenda In India Exposed By Robert Kennedy Jr”)
The India Economic Times reported:
“The committee found that…In many other cases, thumbprint impressions of their poor and illiterate parents were duly affixed onto the consent form. The children also had no idea about the nature of the disease or the vaccine.”
Gates could be prosecuted on these grounds alone, by any duly sworn prosecutor in any nation that is signatory to the Nuremberg Code of the Geneva Conventions, against illegal medical experimentation. The Nuremberg Code was established following the trial of the Nazi doctor Josef Mengele, stating that no experiments could be conducted on a person without their fully informed consent.
Seven of the 23 defendants at Nuremberg were sentenced to death.
Last year Fauci and others recited that if only everyone in the nation wore masks consistently, 130,000 lives could be saved. It turns out that the study which made this conclusion came out of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which is heavily funded by Bill Gates.
Although the public face projected by Gates may be smiling children in warm, sunny places, the reality is police enforcing lockdowns aimed at the injection refusers in Austria, or police arresting lone surfers who dare to violate the lockdown rules. It is now known that COVID tests can be easily calibrated to generate false positive results.
A takedown of Gates, for example, on Crimes Against Humanity in India, might not immediately stop the global agenda. But it would start grinding the wheels to a halt.
Gates Foundation vaccination promotional literature
Australian police attack anti-lockdown, anti-vaccine mandate protesters