[Corona News Editor’s Note: The inventor of mRNA technology and many scientists have called for the full two years of clinical trials originally proposed to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna, lasting through the end of 2022, to be completed before any consideration of approval for general use. This is partly based on disturbing data from a Japanese study, that the spike proteins circulate throughout the body, rather than stay anchored at the injection site. The authors point to a June 1 petition to the FDA by scientists which states that: “All studies we are aware of to date raise concerns about the safety of spike proteins…” The petition calls for the completion of the planned two years of controlled clinical trials, lasting through to the end of 2022, in order to study “concerns” over “reduced fertility, miscarriages, and preterm births.” The scientists say: “There is preliminary and theoretical evidence that the spike protein may promote cancer.” – Corona News Editors]
By Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, and Professor Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD, Yale School of Public Health, June 22, 2021
One remarkable aspect of the Covid-19 pandemic has been how often unpopular scientific ideas, from the lab-leak theory to the efficacy of masks, were initially dismissed, even ridiculed, only to resurface later in mainstream thinking. Differences of opinion have sometimes been rooted in disagreement over the underlying science. But the more common motivation has been political.
Another reversal in thinking may be imminent. Some scientists have raised concerns that the safety risks of Covid-19 vaccines have been underestimated. But the politics of vaccination has relegated their concerns to the outskirts of scientific thinking—for now.
Historically, the safety of medications—including vaccines—is often not fully understood until they are deployed in large populations. Examples include rofecoxib (Vioxx), a pain reliever that increased the risk of heart attack and stroke; antidepressants that appeared to increase suicide attempts among young adults; and an influenza vaccine used in the 2009-10 swine flu epidemic that was suspected of causing febrile convulsions and narcolepsy in children. Evidence from the real world is valuable, as clinical trials often enroll patients who aren’t representative of the general population. We learn more about drug safety from real-world evidence and can adjust clinical recommendations to balance risk and benefits.
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or Vaers, which is administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration, is a database that allows Americans to document adverse events that happen after receiving a vaccine. The FDA and CDC state that the database isn’t designed to determine whether the events were caused by a vaccine. This is true. But the data can nonetheless be evaluated, accounting for its strengths and weaknesses, and that is what the CDC and FDA say they do.
The Vaers data for Covid-19 vaccines show an interesting pattern. Among the 310 million Covid-19 vaccines given, several adverse events are reported at high rates in the days immediately after vaccination, and then fall precipitously afterward. Some of these adverse events might have occurred anyway. The pattern may be partly attributable to the tendency to report more events that happen soon after vaccination.
The database can’t say what would have happened in the absence of vaccination. Nonetheless, the large clustering of certain adverse events immediately after vaccination is concerning, and the silence around these potential signals of harm reflects the politics surrounding Covid-19 vaccines. Stigmatizing such concerns is bad for scientific integrity and could harm patients.
Four serious adverse events follow this arc, according to data taken directly from Vaers: low platelets (thrombocytopenia); noninfectious myocarditis, or heart inflammation, especially for those under 30; deep-vein thrombosis; and death. Vaers records 321 cases of myocarditis within five days of receiving a vaccination, falling to almost zero by 10 days. Prior research has shown that only a fraction of adverse events are reported, so the true number of cases is almost certainly higher. This tendency of underreporting is consistent with our clinical experience.
Analyses to confirm or dismiss these findings should be performed using large data sets of health-insurance companies and healthcare organizations. The CDC and FDA are surely aware of these data patterns, yet neither agency has acknowledged the trend.
The implication is that the risks of a Covid-19 vaccine may outweigh the benefits for certain low-risk populations, such as children, young adults and people who have recovered from Covid-19. This is especially true in regions with low levels of community spread, since the likelihood of illness depends on exposure risk.
And while you would never know it from listening to public-health officials, not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior infection benefit from Covid-19 vaccination. That this isn’t readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci is an indication of how deeply entangled pandemic politics is in science.
There are, however, signs of life for scientific honesty. In May, the Norwegian Medicines Agency reviewed case files for the first 100 reported deaths of nursing-home residents who received the Pfizer vaccine. The agency concluded that the vaccine “likely” contributed to the deaths of 10 of these residents through side effects such as fever and diarrhea, and “possibly” contributed to the deaths of an additional 26. But this type of honesty is rare. And it is rare for any vaccine to be linked to deaths, so this unusual development for mRNA vaccines merits further investigation.
The battle to recover scientific honesty will be an uphill one in the U.S. Anti-Trump politics in the spring of 2020 mushroomed into social-media censorship. News reporting often lacked intellectual curiosity about the appropriateness of public-health guidelines—or why a vocal minority of scientists strongly disagreed with prevailing opinions. Scientists have advocated for or against Covid-19 therapies while having financial relationships with product manufacturers and their foundation benefactors.
Public-health authorities are making a mistake and risking the public’s trust by not being forthcoming about the possibility of harm from certain vaccine side effects. There will be lasting consequences from mingling political partisanship and science during the management of a public-health crisis.
Dr. Ladapo is an associate professor of medicine at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine. Dr. Risch is a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health.
Understand this fight over “vaccination” is at the state house level. If you don’t want to feel helpless send this article link to your state representatives. Get acknowledgement. They may be implicated in Crimes Against Humanity, Nuremberg Code, Geneva Convention. State representative finder.
Carlson called Dr. Malone perhaps “the most qualified person on the planet to discuss the subject.”
The Moderna patent is half-owned by the NIH, the US agency charged with public health, where Dr. Anthony Fauci has been a director for 35 years. Moderna is a new company which has never before brought a drug to market. Pfizer is know as one of the most criminal pharmaceuticals companies in the world, having paid a record $4.6 billion in damages and fines since 2000 for various safety-related and other offenses.
Grave safety issues with the Pfizer and Moderna injections are now being acknowledged even in the pages of the Wall Street Journal and the prestigious British Medical Journal.
The Tucker Carlson interview takes place soon after it was reported by Great Game India, an Indian think-tank, that a two-year-old had died during clinical trials after a second Pfizer shot, although the report in the CDC Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has been pulled without explaination. Both Moderna and Pfizer are now conducting clinical trials for safety and efficacy on children as young as 6 months, even though now nearly 6,000 deaths (updated) have been reported to the CDC’s VAERS which are possibly related to the shots.
“the first participants have been dosed in the Phase 2/3 study, called the KidCOVE study, of mRNA-1273…in children ages 6 months to less than 12 years.… this pediatric study will help us assess the potential safety and immunogenicity of our COVID-19 vaccine candidate in this important younger age population.”
Dr. Malone has criticized the compression of the normal 3 to 6 years of animal trials in drug development. In the censored podcast he said:
“…before we get a product released to use in humans, in the normal situation where we’re not in a rush, we have some really rigorous tests that have to be done in animals. And revealing that spike gets cleaved off of express cells and becomes free is something that absolutely should have been known and understood well before this ever got put in humans.”
Summary of Dr. Malone June 2021 Interview by Discernable (view at Bitchute)
Dr. Malone holds that any discussion of vaccine-related deaths and injuries is being ruthlessly suppressed. Taking Canada as an example for what is happening around the world, he wrote on May 30th:
“I was on a call with a Canadian primary care physician last week for a couple of hours. He related the story of the six (in his mind) highly unusual clinical cases of post-vaccination adverse events that he has personally observed in his practice involving vaccination of his patients with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine product…What was most alarming to me was that my clinical primary practice physician colleague told me that each of these cases were reported as per the proper channels in Canada, and each was summarily determined to not be vaccine related by the authorities without significant investigation. Furthermore, he reported to me that any practicing physician in Canada who goes public with concerns about vaccine safety is subjected to a storm of derision from academic physicians and potential termination of employment…and loss of license to practice.”
In December, a former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, and a German physician, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, called for a halt to all mass vaccinations and human clinical trials of the Pfizer and Moderna injections, based on safety concerns.
Safe Remedies such as HCQ and Ivermectin Suppressed in Order to Drive Vaccine Agenda
Last year Dr. Simone Gold of America’s Frontline Doctors, which challenges Dr. Fauci, the FDA’s and the medical establishment on lockdowns, vaccines, and safe alternative treatments for COVID, was fired from her job after speaking on the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in COVID protocols, which Yale School of Public Health’s Dr. Harvey Risch says could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives.
Last year, two of the world’s most prestigious medical journals, The Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine, the latter affiliated with Harvard, were forced to retract two studies which concluded that HCQ during the treatment of COVID could be bad for the heart, after reviewers found that the studies concluding dangers to the heart were based on fake data.
Similarly, Ivermectin, a safe, decades-old anti-parasitical, has been shown around the world to save lives, including against “variants,” but has been suppressed in the US.
Understand this fight over “vaccination” is at the state house level. If you don’t want to feel helpless send this article link to your state representatives. Get acknowledgement. They may be implicated in Crimes Against Humanity, Nuremberg Code, Geneva Convention. State representative finder.
Directly contradicting Dr. Fauci’s, the FDA’s, and the media and medical establishment’s relentless campaign to inject as many Americans as possible with what are, at least until the end of 2022, officially experimental drugs, the inventor of the mRNA core technology has sounded the alarm on new data showing the vaccines are “dangerous,” with possible long-term effects which can only be guessed at.
Dr. Robert Malone, in essence, all but indicated that, given the new data, the mRNA injections are a ticking time bomb.
In a key exchange in the interview, Dr. Malone addressed a recent Japanese study which shows that the mRNA shot does not work in the manner intended. All new drugs have typically undergone three to six years of animal trials. The scientists agree that the public has been placed in “danger” by the injections.
The scientists addressed grave concerns that the “spike protein,” circulates throughout the body and accumulates in organs, bones, and especially, ovaries.
Introducing the topic, Dr. Bret Weinstein said (RUSH TRANSCRIPTOF FULL INTERVIEW VIDEO BELOW, DR. MALONE IS “SPEAKER 3”):
“So I must say that this is a difficult topic for us to address. We all, I believe, are agreed that something very serious is afoot and the public is largely unaware that they have been placed into a kind of danger. And we also know that there’s a great deal of stigma directed at those who would explore these dangers.”
“They did not believe the spike was biologically active. That was the big mystery.”
“Now know the spike protein is very dangerous there. It is violent. We also know so if it was very dangerous, but it did what the brochure on these vaccines says it should do, which is large in the membrane of the cells that are doing the transcribing, it would be a lot less destructive, right?”
Dr. Malone:
“I think that’s fair. And you’re right. It’s not just the literature that the the documentation about the vaccine. It’s the prior literature that was put out by the people that developed it that developed these clones. So they were they were aware that there was a risk of Spike being biologically active in having adverse events if it did not stay stuck to the cells that were transected, that got the RNA and made it OK. And and they used a genetic engineering method of putting a trans membrane domain on it to ensure that it stayed anchored and stayed put. And there they did limited, non-clinical studies to say looks like it stays stuck. We engineered it to stay stuck. They did. And they published it. Here’s the thing…Is that that’s generally not good enough in a non-clinical data package…”
“…before we get a product released to use in humans, in the normal situation where we’re not in a rush, we have some really rigorous tests that have to be done in animals. And revealing that spike gets cleaved off of express cells and becomes free is something that absolutely should have been known and understood well before this ever got put in humans.”
Summary of Dr. Malone June 2021 Interview by Discernable (view at Bitchute)
Inventor of mRNA Dr. Robert Malone, Full Interview (view at Bitchute)
For a year now, many doctors and scientists have urged the FDA and governments to proceed with caution, as mRNA technology, according to the inventor Dr. Malone, is a completely novel medical technology, which has never been authorized for general use or for “emergency use,” as the FDA has granted.
In December, a former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, and a German physician, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, called for a halt to all mass vaccinations and human clinical trials of the Pfizer and Moderna injections, based on safety concerns.
Multiple groups of doctors and scientists have also called for a halt to the human experimentation, which based on short term human trials last year, is being called “safe and effective.” The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to market is 10 years, including 3 to 6 years of animal trials. (Links to doctors’ calls for halts, partial list: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
The number of deaths possibly related to the mRNA injections made by Pfizer and Moderna is now over 5,000 in the US, approximately one-third of them within 48 hours of receiving the shots, in one sample. Although the pharma companies deny any causal relation, requests for medical reports and autopsies to confirm this have been ignored.
In December the British health authority warned people with food allergies not to take the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 experimental vaccine injection, warning of “anaphylactoid reactions.”
Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield has joined the ranks of scientists now saying that they believe the COVID-19 virus was man-made, some saying deliberately.
Fox News’ Ingraham 2010 Rockefeller “Scenario” for Universal Biochip ID
The blockbuster remarks from the inventor of mRNA technology take place as a corner of the mainstream media reveals that in 2010, a think tank for the Rockefeller family described a scenario in which an end goal is universal biometric IDs.
“Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens…”
Fox News’ Laura Ingraham Calls Out Rockefeller Foundation on 2010 Lockdown, Biometric ID Blueprint (view at Bitchute)
In October 2020, the Rockefeller partnered with the World Economic Forum, an elite international business club founded by Klaus Schwab, consisting of the world’s richest people and most powerful and connected corporations, and the two hatched a future scenario called the Commons Project, in which in was ascertained, in “Rebuilding Trust for International Travel”:
“the world needs a unified digital infrastructure and health trust framework, where health data can be shared securely across borders…”
An international “unified digital infrastructure…framework” is nothing less than an all-seeing, world database of almost all humans.
Below: World Economic Forum “Commons Project” page in collaboration with Rockefeller Foundation (source)(click for larger image)
Below: Passage from Rockefeller Foundation – World Economic Forum page detailing international database for all humans (source)(click to view larger image)
“World Economic Forum Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab has proposed using the overreaction to coronavirus to launch a worldwide “Great Reset.” This Great Reset is about expanding government power and suppressing liberty worldwide…The Great Reset will dramatically expand the surveillance state via real-time tracking. It will also mandate that people receive digital certificates in order to travel and even technology implanted in their bodies to monitor them.”
As has become typical, major media “debunks,” from organizations owned by the same people possibly making these plans, utilize standard propaganda “straw man” techniques which assert that the documents do not “prove” dire intent, when no one said they did. Lack of proof, however, is not lack of evidence.
Strategic Connections, Strategic LIes
Ingraham’s willingness to probe “behind the curtain,” after what has turned out to be, in the words of former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, a campaign of “demonstrable” lies, is accompanied by a solid paper trail of links between key influencers of the international response to COVID, and technologies which will be needed to accomplish “The Great Reset.” These “lies,” an unusually strong word for the soft-spoken Dr. Yeadon, have been apparently agreed upon at the highest levels and relentlessly promulgated by governments, the medical establishment, and the media.
“in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything…”
Dr. Yeadon is talking about UK, but he says the lies are coordinated across governments. On one subject, “variants,” he says:
“There was no possibility at all, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous]…“Nevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are saying that they are. They’re lying. Well, why would you do that?”
Other centers of controversy have been:
No Other Remedies for COVID But “Vaccines”
Evidence continues to build that remedies were available which might have reduced COVID deaths by 70%. This is according to some of the most eminent doctors in the world, who nevertheless lost their Twitter accounts in a concerted push to deny the sick an excellent chance of recovery, as the FDA and Big Tech suppressed the information. Why?
Possibly because besides raising the death count, if a crisis is what you want to create, FDA “emergency use authorization (EUA)” rules state that EUA can only be granted if there is no other safe and effective remedy.
Just one example will suffice to show that Fauci, the medical establishment, WHO, the FDA, and the media all colluded to lie about COVID remedies. This was the effort to associate hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) – a key ingredient in some protocols – with heart arrhythmia.
In May 2020, Fauci said that not only was there no evidence that showed the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine was effective at treating COVID-19, at least not that met his “gold standard,” but that it could actually be harmful, causing heart problems. Fauci said:
“There was suspicion of that for a while, but as data comes in, it becomes more clear,”
Fauci never said where he got this idea. But a week later, two of the world’s most prestigious medical journals, The Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine, the latter affiliated with Harvard, were forced to yank two studies which concluded that HCQ during the treatment of COVID could be bad for the heart. Thanks to a letter by 200 doctors and scientists challenging one of the studies, it was found that both were based on faked data.
Then in August 2020, the NIH published a study which seemed aimed at exploring where else Fauci would get such an idea about HCQ and heart arrhythmia. But it came up dry. In fact, not only did the science literature indicate that HCQ was not dangerous to the heart, it seemed to indicate that it was actually protective of it.
There was one study, however, which did come to the “dangerous” conclusion. It was a Brazilian study, which gave subjects up to six times maximum recommended dose of HCQ, in the form of Plaquenil, the popular and common malaria drug with a 60 year safety record.
“Adults: 800 mg followed by 400 mg at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the initial dose.“
No surprise,then, that heart palpitations would result.
On the other side, over 6,000 doctors around the world, and dozens of studies, were telling Fauci another story, that HCQ, used in the correct manner, saved lives.
Addressing the exposed and retracted Lancet and NEJM studies, the respected magazine Science found that the web is still rife with articles, even in respected medical journals, which maintain the conclusion that HCQ is dangerous, based on references to the disgraced articles.
Fauci and the WHO/FDA’s warnings against HCQ and Ivermectin stand to this day.
Worst Pandemic Since the Spanish Flu
Not even close. The real surprise is that, worldwide, there have been no “excess deaths,” that is, any more deaths than would have been expected in ordinary times. That does not mean there were no excess deaths anywhere. With only 4% of the world’s population, the US, with one of the most advanced medical infrastructures in the world, suffered 16% of the deaths attributed to COVID as of June 2021. About 20% of those, according to a University of Virginia-Yale joint study, can be attributed to the effects of lockdowns such as deferred critical medical care and “deaths of despair” such as opiod overdoses and suicides.
In addition, it is questionable if the number of deaths in the US would have taken off so sharply had governors of some densely populated states not enforced a policy of placing thousands of COVID patients into nursing homes. Finally, countries in which there were excess deaths, a relatively small number of advanced Western, mostly NATO, countries: Italy, France, UK, Poland, Spain, Portugal, Bulgaria, Hungary, and of course, the US, almost all enforced a policy of suppressing HCQ and Ivermectin as cheap, safe remedies.
Although there were no excess deaths on average globally, in the US there were just over 10% more deaths than expected in an ordinary year, more than most of the world’s poorest and most medically backwards countries.
Within the US, comparisons to the Spanish Flu constantly made in the media were dishonest. Although 600,000 dead now (if the numbers are to be believed, another story) is comparable to 675,000 in the Spanish Flu, this neglects that the US population was much smaller in 1918. About a third of what it is now. In per-capita terms, the Spanish Flu death toll was far closer to the 1957 and 1968 flu pandemics. But these were never mentioned in the media, nor at those times was there ever any talk of masks or lockdowns.
The US COVID pandemic was the first in the US in which death counting conventions allowed anyone who died “with COVID” to be counted as having died “of COVID.” These were the words of White House Coronavirus Task Force advisor Dr. Deborah Birx. One methodical study of nearly 3,000 death certificates found that 40% of them were mislabeled as COVID. Last May, Dr. Deborah Birx suggested that COVID deaths were being overcounted by 25%, or 150,000 people by today.
The list goes on, too long to recount all of it here. It is recommended that the reader peruse the articles in this website.
Elites Like Gates Financed Critical Components of Lockdowns and “Great Reset”
As for connections between elite players, key aspect of the COVID response, and the technologies needed to bring on “The Great Reset,” we know:
The FDA, which declares when vaccines are “safe,” owes half its annual budget to the pharmaceuticals industry.
In a remarkable conflict of interest, the World Health Organization, which guides pandemic response from policy on remedies such as Ivermectin to COVID testing, receives 10% to 13% of its funding, as much as the entire US donation, from one man, Bill Gates. who has been heavily invested in vaccine companies, including Pfizer and Moderna, for many years. Although Gates carefully cultivates the image of a late-life billionaire generously giving much of his fortune away, Gates’ personal net worth has climbed steadily in line with his giving. Below source: The Nation, “Bill Gates’s Charity Paradox“
“Fact-check” websites which relentlessly keep the official COVID narrative on track, such as PolitiFact.com and FactCheck.org, coincidentally receive large funding from Gates through their parent organizations the Poynter Institute, and the Annenberg Foundation. In other words, the “fact checkers” ruthlessly suppressing HCQ and Iverectin are paid for by the same people interested in widespread vaccination being seen as the only solution.
Last year Fauci said that if everyone in the country wore masks consistently, 130,000 lives could be saved. The number for this statement came out of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which is heavily funded by Bill Gates.
A huge, unreported scandal in the US has been that US health authorities have been actively promoting the long-term wearing of masks which are known to cause lung-damage due to containing the nano-material graphene. These have been banned in Canada.
Like Fauci, Gates, who is not a scientist and did not even graduate from college, has an uncanny knack for predicting pandemics. saying in 2018, ” if history has taught us anything, it’s that there will be another deadly global pandemic.” In 2017 Fauci said with great certainty that there was “No doubt” Trump would face a surprise infectious disease outbreak.
Given the near certainty now that the virus was man-made, and that Fauci played no small part in funding the gain-of-function researchwhich makes viruses more transmittable, it might behoove the world to ask Fauci if his prescience was informed by inside knowledge.
Gates for his part keeps making predictions, and in December spoke as if COVID was just a dress rehearsal. Gates said, with an unseemly smirk, that there will soon be another pandemic, which “this time,” “WILL get attention.”
Right out the gate, do not pass go, this is already a Crime Against Humanity which violates the Geneva Convention, Nuremberg Code. There is no way children can give informed consent to what was, until end of August, officially experimental drugs. (They still are, but that’s another story.)
Meanwhile, its possible the parents of these children are unaware of these facts.“
An update reports that the CDC has removed the VAERS report (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) report #1074247. Because reports are sequentially numbered, it can be determined that a report is missing. The report lists the death of a two-year-old, a little girl.
If nothing else, experimentation of drugs which have shown off-the-charts side effects and deaths, on children, set a tone for moral vacuousness against which everything else must be compared. It means, quite simply, these people are Nazis, and we should never trust them about anything.
In March, one of the two mRNA experimental COVID treatment makers, Moderna, announced that it would begin clinical trials for safety and efficacy on children as young a 6 months.
“the first participants have been dosed in the Phase 2/3 study, called the KidCOVE study, of mRNA-1273…in children ages 6 months to less than 12 years.… this pediatric study will help us assess the potential safety and immunogenicity of our COVID-19 vaccine candidate in this important younger age population.”
The World Health Organization (WHO) implicates itself in the understanding that the drugs are not necessarily “safe and effective” by admitting, in its latest guidance, that “more evidence is needed”:
“More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.”
What? They are putting these things into young children and they admit they don’t know what they are going to do? “More evidence is needed?”
Has the world gone insane? Yes.
It is beyond question, by their own words, that children as young as 6 months, who cannot possibly give consent, are being experimented upon, in the pursuit of data pertaining to safety.
“Operation Warp Speed” cut short the typical three to six years of animal trials in drug and vaccine development, before human trials are started. The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to market is 10 years. There is no escaping the fact, however one wishes to rationalize it, that what is being done on children at this point is normally what would be being done on large numbers of test animals, using the novel mRNA technology, for drugs for which human adult trials are set to last through the end of 2022 at the earliest.
The fastest vaccine ever developed was for mumps, which took four years, including years of animal trials first, before humans. This is pure bloody murder before our eyes.
“I don’t think proving this in an animal model is on the critical path to getting this to a clinical trial,”
Not if Anthony Fauci is in charge.
Zaks does not explain how this could be, and no one in the media asks him, not Chris Cuomo, not Lester Holt, given that there are now over 500,000 “adverse events” entered into the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, (VAERS,) including 12,000 deaths, 41,000 hospitalizations, 13,000 permanent disabilities, 11,000 “life threatening,” and 300 birth defects. One-third of the deaths occurred within 48 hours, in one large sample.
The risk of a child dying of COVID is essentially zero, or .002%, the same as flu. The median age of the COVID victim is 80.
Below: Families Describe Permanent Vaccine Injuries and Deaths (FULL HEARING)
It must be said by someone, that in any ethically-sane view of the world, such child experimentation is the strongest suggestion yet that we are in the hands of sociopaths, the FDA, Fauci, all of them. To do medical experiments on babies is flatly against the Nuremberg Code, and a prosecutable international crime.
Babies cannot consent to be used as tests for safety, anymore than they can consent to be raped. To this wasteland have our leaders brought us, by flogging fear over a 99.8% recovery rate virus, as they deny life-saving remedies such as Ivermectin, which have reduced COVID mortality by 70%.
These are the leaders we trust with lockdown powers, and to tell us when “variants” are coming along. Whom we have believed and followed for well over a year.
Both Moderna and Pfizer Dissolve Control Groups
It was reported this week that both Moderna and Pfizer, contrary to every principle of science, dissolved their control groups for the mRNA clinical trials injections, making any scientific long-term conclusions on efficacy and safety impossible. Therefore at this point, all clinical trials on which officials are using the terms “safe and effective” are junk science. It has been noted that one of these companies doing this might be put down to an unfortunate, but rare, lapse of good science. But for both of them to do so reeks of a cover-up for the most genocidal group of governments ever seen on the face of the planet. And they were none too nice before.
Moderna Chief Science Officer Tal Zaks, “Junk Scientist”
Internet Set Ablaze by mRNA Vaccine Inventor Sounding Alarm
Summary of Dr. Malone June 2021 Interview by Discernable (view at Bitchute)
An eminent immunologist, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a Thai-German, says that the “delta” and other variant viruses are exaggerated by health authorities, but that, ominously, the runaway spike protein problem in the mRNA shots may be turn out to be terrifying, eventually causing the body’s immune system to attack its own organs (see presentation below.)
If and when a vaccine-related disaster ever happens, one group of 57 international doctors and scientists has written an open warning that vaccine deaths may be indistinguishable from COVID deaths, and used as an excuse to impose hitherto unfathomable levels social control and martial law.
All this would be over a a virus which it now seems Anthony Fauci helped create, which, globally, has caused no “excess deaths” over what would normally have been expected, but which did disproportionately impact nations, such as the US, which banned remedies such as HCQ and Ivermectin.
The US was one of the two dozen or so countries with higher-than-expected total deaths for 2020, about 13% more deaths over the roughly 3 million Americans who are expected to die each year of all causes.
As the Biden administration’s position on the injections is weaponise employers and businesses to make “vaccine” mandates, protection against such mandates now lies in the state legislatures. Organizations such as RightToRefuse.Org have so far successfully passed state laws against vaccine passports and mandates in 14 states. RightToRefuse.Org welcomes new members in all states. Another organization is NationalHealthFreedom.org, which has created an online tool for easily writing to all of one’s state legislators at once.
Below: Armoni Howard, 26 year-old, dead soon after employer mandatefor COVID “vaccine.” His mother Apiffany Lentini “said that she wanted everyone to know about her son and that the coronavirus vaccine took his life.” (“Victims of COVID “Vaccine” Employer Mandates Grows“)
Naturally BA upholds government line nothing ever has anything to do with “vaccines.” Denies being in “crisis talks” with government over letting “vaccinated” pilots fly. Pilots were fit and healthy. All commercial must regularly meet physical fitness standards. The odds of four active duty (not retired, elderly) company pilots dying in one week is astronomical. “Fact-check” “debunks” all predictable “no proof” deceptions which do not rule out that the vaccines may be responsible, but simply say there is “no proof” they did. The fact remains that outside of clinical trials and careful autopsies, which are never performed, no one can know, which allows an obfuscation strategy.
Four Healthy British Airways Pilots Die in One Week – Airline Says No Link to Covid-19 Vaccine
Four young and healthy British Airways pilots recently passed away and the airline is claiming there is no link to the Covid-19 vaccine.
The photo of the four books of condolence sitting next to framed pictures of the pilots was posted to Twitter and authenticated by Reuters.
“Reuters presented the claims to British Airways, which said they were unfounded and that no such talks were underway with the government. The spokesperson, however, confirmed the authenticity of the four condolence books, as four company pilots had recently passed away. “Our thoughts are with their family and friends,” they said, adding that none of the deaths was linked to vaccines.
A recording (unconfirmed) of a male discussing the deaths is circulating social media….MORE
[Update: Dr. Malone spoke recently on the Tucker Carlson Show (at 8 minutes)]
Directly contradicting Dr. Fauci’s, the FDA’s, and the media and medical establishment’s relentless campaign to inject as many Americans as possible with what are, at least until the end of 2022, officially experimental drugs, the inventor of the mRNA core technology has sounded the alarm on new data showing the vaccines are “dangerous,” with possible long-term effects which can only be guessed at.
Dr. Robert Malone, in essence, all but indicated that, given the new data, the mRNA injections are a ticking time bomb.
In a key exchange in the interview, Dr. Malone addressed a recent Japanese study which shows that the mRNA shot does not work in the manner intended. All new drugs have typically undergone three to six years of animal trials. The scientists agree that the public has been placed in “danger” by the injections.
The scientists addressed grave concerns that the “spike protein,” circulates throughout the body and accumulates in organs, bones, and especially, ovaries.
Introducing the topic, Dr. Bret Weinstein said (RUSH TRANSCRIPTOF FULL INTERVIEW VIDEO BELOW, DR. MALONE IS “SPEAKER 3”):
“So I must say that this is a difficult topic for us to address. We all, I believe, are agreed that something very serious is afoot and the public is largely unaware that they have been placed into a kind of danger. And we also know that there’s a great deal of stigma directed at those who would explore these dangers.”
“They did not believe the spike was biologically active. That was the big mystery.”
“Now know the spike protein is very dangerous there. It is violent. We also know so if it was very dangerous, but it did what the brochure on these vaccines says it should do, which is large in the membrane of the cells that are doing the transcribing, it would be a lot less destructive, right?”
Dr. Malone:
“I think that’s fair. And you’re right. It’s not just the literature that the the documentation about the vaccine. It’s the prior literature that was put out by the people that developed it that developed these clones. So they were they were aware that there was a risk of Spike being biologically active in having adverse events if it did not stay stuck to the cells that were transected, that got the RNA and made it OK. And and they used a genetic engineering method of putting a trans membrane domain on it to ensure that it stayed anchored and stayed put. And there they did limited, non-clinical studies to say looks like it stays stuck. We engineered it to stay stuck. They did. And they published it. Here’s the thing…Is that that’s generally not good enough in a non-clinical data package…”
“…before we get a product released to use in humans, in the normal situation where we’re not in a rush, we have some really rigorous tests that have to be done in animals. And revealing that spike gets cleaved off of express cells and becomes free is something that absolutely should have been known and understood well before this ever got put in humans.”
Summary of Dr. Malone June 2021 Interview by Discernable (view at Bitchute)
Inventor of mRNA Dr. Robert Malone, Full Interview (view at Bitchute)
For a year now, many doctors and scientists have urged the FDA and governments to proceed with caution, as mRNA technology, according to the inventor Dr. Malone, is a completely novel medical technology, which has never been authorized for general use or for “emergency use,” as the FDA has granted.
In December, a former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, and a German physician, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, called for a halt to all mass vaccinations and human clinical trials of the Pfizer and Moderna injections, based on safety concerns.
Multiple groups of doctors and scientists have also called for a halt to the human experimentation, which based on short term human trials last year, is being called “safe and effective.” The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to market is 10 years, including 3 to 6 years of animal trials. (Links to doctors’ calls for halts, partial list: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
The number of deaths possibly related to the mRNA injections made by Pfizer and Moderna is now over 12,000 in the US, approximately one-third of them within 48 hours of receiving the shots, in one sample. Although the pharma companies deny any causal relation, requests for medical reports and autopsies to confirm this have been ignored.
Most drug trials are halted after 25 to 50 possibly related deaths, as a swine flu vaccine was in 1976. The fastest vaccine ever developed was for mumps, in the 1960s, which took four years before general use.
In December the British health authority warned people with food allergies not to take the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 experimental vaccine injection, warning of “anaphylactoid reactions.”
On June 2 the Israeli Ministry of Health announced a “probable link” between the Pfizer injection and inflammation of the heart in young males. Moderna’s and Pfizer’s own fact sheets say that “many” in the population with other allergies “should not” take the mRNA injections.
Nevertheless, these are never mentioned in the daily drive by news anchors and politicians to drive every person to take the shots, up to and including threats of job loss and social shunning. Most recently, a vicious drive is on to blame illnesses on people who decline the shots. But why would anyone trust corporations with no scruples against experimenting for safety on six-month-old babies, and insanely calling them willing “participants?” Why would anyone trust the FDA, and the US government, which allow it?
Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield has joined the ranks of scientists now saying that they believe the COVID-19 virus was man-made, some saying deliberately.
Fox News’ Ingraham Slams 2010 Rockefeller “Scenario” for Universal Biochip ID
The blockbuster remarks from the inventor of mRNA technology take place as a corner of the mainstream media reveals that in 2010, a think tank for the Rockefeller family described a scenario in which an end goal is universal biometric IDs.
“Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens…”
Fox News’ Laura Ingraham Calls Out Rockefeller Foundation on 2010 Lockdown, Biometric ID Blueprint (view at Bitchute)
In October 2020, the Rockefeller partnered with the World Economic Forum, an elite international business club founded by Klaus Schwab, consisting of the world’s richest people and most powerful and connected corporations, and the two hatched a future scenario called the Commons Project, in which in was ascertained, in “Rebuilding Trust for International Travel”:
“the world needs a unified digital infrastructure and health trust framework, where health data can be shared securely across borders…”
An international “unified digital infrastructure…framework” is nothing less than an all-seeing, world database of almost all humans.
Below: World Economic Forum “Commons Project” page in collaboration with Rockefeller Foundation (source)(click for larger image)
Below: Passage from Rockefeller Foundation – World Economic Forum page detailing international database for all humans (source) (click to view larger image)
“World Economic Forum Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab has proposed using the overreaction to coronavirus to launch a worldwide “Great Reset.” This Great Reset is about expanding government power and suppressing liberty worldwide…The Great Reset will dramatically expand the surveillance state via real-time tracking. It will also mandate that people receive digital certificates in order to travel and even technology implanted in their bodies to monitor them.”
As has become typical, major media “debunks,” from organizations owned by the same people possibly making these plans, utilize standard propaganda “straw man” techniques which assert that the documents do not “prove” dire intent, when no one said they did. Lack of proof, however, is not lack of evidence.
Strategic Connections, Strategic LIes
Ingraham’s willingness to probe “behind the curtain,” after what has turned out to be, in the words of former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, a campaign of “demonstrable” lies, is accompanied by a solid paper trail of links between key influencers of the international response to COVID, and technologies which will be needed to accomplish “The Great Reset.” These “lies,” an unusually strong word for the soft-spoken Dr. Yeadon, have been apparently agreed upon at the highest levels and relentlessly promulgated by governments, the medical establishment, and the media.
“in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything…”
Dr. Yeadon is talking about UK, but he says the lies are coordinated across governments. On one subject, “variants,” he says:
“There was no possibility at all, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous]…“Nevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are saying that they are. They’re lying. Well, why would you do that?”
Below: Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer and VP at Pfizer, respiratory illnesses division
Some other lies:
No Other Remedies for COVID But “Vaccines”
Evidence continues to build that remedies were available which might have reduced COVID deaths by 70%. This is according to some of the most eminent doctors in the world, who nevertheless lost their Twitter accounts in a concerted push to deny the sick an excellent chance of recovery, as the FDA and Big Tech suppressed the information. Why?
Possibly because besides raising the death count, if a crisis is what you want to create, FDA “emergency use authorization (EUA)” rules state that EUA can only be granted if there is no other safe and effective remedy.
Just one example will suffice to show that Fauci, the medical establishment, WHO, the FDA, and the media all colluded to lie about COVID remedies. This was the effort to associate hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) – a key ingredient in some protocols – with heart arrhythmia.
In May 2020, Fauci said that not only was there no evidence that showed the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine was effective at treating COVID-19, at least not that met his “gold standard,” but that it could actually be harmful, causing heart problems. Fauci said:
“There was suspicion of that for a while, but as data comes in, it becomes more clear,”
Fauci never said where he got this idea. But a week later, two of the world’s most prestigious medical journals, The Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine, the latter affiliated with Harvard, were forced to yank two studies which concluded that HCQ during the treatment of COVID could be bad for the heart. Thanks to a letter by 200 doctors and scientists challenging one of the studies, it was found that both were based on faked data.
Then in August 2020, the NIH published a study which seemed aimed at exploring where else Fauci would get such an idea about HCQ and heart arrhythmia. But it came up dry. In fact, not only did the science literature indicate that HCQ was not dangerous to the heart, it seemed to indicate that it was actually protective of it.
There was one study, however, which did come to the “dangerous” conclusion. It was a Brazilian study, which gave subjects up to six times maximum recommended dose of HCQ, in the form of Plaquenil, the popular and common malaria drug with a 60 year safety record.
“Adults: 800 mg followed by 400 mg at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the initial dose.“
No surprise,then, that heart palpitations would result.
On the other side, over 6,000 doctors around the world, and dozens of studies, were telling Fauci another story, that HCQ, used in the correct manner, saved lives.
Addressing the exposed and retracted Lancet and NEJM studies, the respected magazine Science found that the web is still rife with articles, even in respected medical journals, which maintain the conclusion that HCQ is dangerous, based on references to the disgraced articles.
Fauci and the WHO/FDA’s warnings against HCQ and Ivermectin stand to this day.
Worst Pandemic Since the Spanish Flu
Not even close. The real surprise is that, worldwide, there have been no “excess deaths,” that is, any more deaths than would have been expected in ordinary times. That does not mean there were no excess deaths anywhere. With only 4% of the world’s population, the US, with one of the most advanced medical infrastructures in the world, suffered 16% of the deaths attributed to COVID as of June 2021. About 20% of those, according to a University of Virginia-Yale joint study, can be attributed to the effects of lockdowns such as deferred critical medical care and “deaths of despair” such as opiod overdoses and suicides.
In addition, it is questionable if the number of deaths in the US would have taken off so sharply had governors of some densely populated states not enforced a policy of placing thousands of COVID patients into nursing homes. Finally, countries in which there were excess deaths, a relatively small number of advanced Western, mostly NATO, countries: Italy, France, UK, Poland, Spain, Portugal, Bulgaria, Hungary, and of course, the US, almost all enforced a policy of suppressing HCQ and Ivermectin as cheap, safe remedies.
Although there were no excess deaths on average globally, in the US there were just over 10% more deaths than expected in an ordinary year, more than most of the world’s poorest and most medically backwards countries.
Within the US, comparisons to the Spanish Flu constantly made in the media were dishonest. Although 600,000 dead now (if the numbers are to be believed, another story) is comparable to 675,000 in the Spanish Flu, this neglects that the US population was much smaller in 1918. About a third of what it is now. In per-capita terms, the Spanish Flu death toll was far closer to the 1957 and 1968 flu pandemics. But these were never mentioned in the media, nor at those times was there ever any talk of masks or lockdowns.
The US COVID pandemic was the first in the US in which death counting conventions allowed anyone who died “with COVID” to be counted as having died “of COVID.” These were the words of White House Coronavirus Task Force advisor Dr. Deborah Birx. One methodical study of nearly 3,000 death certificates found that 40% of them were mislabeled as COVID. Last May, Dr. Deborah Birx suggested that COVID deaths were being overcounted by 25%, or 150,000 people by today.
The list goes on, too long to recount all of it here. It is recommended that the reader peruse the articles in this website.
Elites Like Gates Financed Critical Components of Lockdowns and “Great Reset”
As for connections between elite players, key aspect of the COVID response, and the technologies needed to bring on “The Great Reset,” we know:
The FDA, which declares when vaccines are “safe,” owes half its annual budget to the pharmaceuticals industry.
In a remarkable conflict of interest, the World Health Organization, which guides pandemic response from policy on remedies such as Ivermectin to COVID testing, receives 10% to 13% of its funding, as much as the entire US donation, from one man, Bill Gates. who has been heavily invested in vaccine companies, including Pfizer and Moderna, for many years. Although Gates carefully cultivates the image of a late-life billionaire generously giving much of his fortune away, Gates’ personal net worth has climbed steadily in line with his giving. Below source: The Nation, “Bill Gates’s Charity Paradox“
“Fact-check” websites which relentlessly keep the official COVID narrative on track, such as PolitiFact.com and FactCheck.org, coincidentally receive large funding from Gates through their parent organizations the Poynter Institute, and the Annenberg Foundation. In other words, the “fact checkers” ruthlessly suppressing HCQ and Iverectin are paid for by the same people interested in widespread vaccination being seen as the only solution.
Last year Fauci said that if everyone in the country wore masks consistently, 130,000 lives could be saved. The number for this statement came out of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which is heavily funded by Bill Gates.
A huge, unreported scandal in the US has been that US health authorities have been actively promoting the long-term wearing of masks which are known to cause lung-damage due to containing the nano-material graphene. These have been banned in Canada.
Like Fauci, Gates, who is not a scientist and did not even graduate from college, has an uncanny knack for predicting pandemics. saying in 2018, ” if history has taught us anything, it’s that there will be another deadly global pandemic.” In 2017 Fauci said with great certainty that there was “No doubt” Trump would face a surprise infectious disease outbreak.
Given the near certainty now that the virus was man-made, and that Fauci played no small part in funding the gain-of-function researchwhich makes viruses more transmittable, it might behoove the world to ask Fauci if his prescience was informed by inside knowledge.
Gates for his part keeps making predictions, and in December spoke as if COVID was just a dress rehearsal. Gates said, with an unseemly smirk, that there will soon be another pandemic, which “this time,” “WILL get attention.”
For context, the swine flu vaccine program in 1976 in the US, which was administered to 40 million Americans, 25% of the population, was halted after 25 possibly related deaths.
There are more US deaths related to vaccines in 2021 in less than 5 months than there were the entire past decade.
The number of deaths linked to vaccines this year has absolutely skyrocketed. According to the CDC’s own data, in 2021 n the first 3 months, the VAERS website recorded over 1,750 deaths due to vaccines in the US.
“The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database contains information on unverified reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms) following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. Reports are accepted from anyone and can be submitted electronically at www.vaers.hhs.gov.”
There were huge increases over last week. Deaths went up by an additional 700 in a week.
VAERS COVID Vaccine Data (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, USA)
329,021 Reports Through June 4, 2021 DEATHS 5,888 HOSPITALIZATIONS 19,597 Urgent Care 43,891 OFFICE VISITS 58,800
Dr. Ron Paul, who wrote an essay warning of the end-game for the coronavirus outbreak, was banned from communicating with his millions of followers on Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook.
The former congressman, presidential candidate, and family physician has been a perpetual thorn in the side of big Wall Street banks, and oligarchs such as Bill Gates.
“With no explanation other than “repeatedly going against our community standards,” @Facebook has blocked me from managing my page. Never have we received notice of violating community standards in the past and nowhere is the offending post identified.”
Dr. Paul joins another former high government official, Catherine Austin Fitts, in detailing a plan to use mandatory vaccinations as a gateway into people’s bodies for the purpose of connecting them to artificial intelligence control and surveillance platforms. Fitts was Assistant Secretary of Housing and Human Development under President George HW Bush. Long seemingly in the realm of science fiction, even mainstream sources such as CBS 60 Minutes have reported on coming biochip technology, in an interview with retired US Army Col. Matt Hepburn, who worked at the government’s secretive Defense Department DARPA.
“What if everyone on board had their health monitored with this subdermal implant, now in late-stage testing. It’s not some dreaded government microchip to track your every move, but a tissue-like gel engineered to continuously test your blood.
Dr. Matt Hepburn: It’s a sensor.
Bill Whitaker: This tiny green thing in there?
Dr. Matt Hepburn: That tiny green thing in there, you put it underneath your skin and what that tells you is that there are chemical reactions going on inside the body and that signal means you are going to have symptoms tomorrow.
Bill Whitaker: Wow. There’s an– an actual transmitter in that–“
With no explanation other than "repeatedly going against our community standards," @Facebook has blocked me from managing my page. Never have we received notice of violating community standards in the past and nowhere is the offending post identified. pic.twitter.com/EdMyW9gufa
“World Economic Forum Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab has proposed using the overreaction to coronavirus to launch a worldwide “Great Reset.” This Great Reset is about expanding government power and suppressing liberty worldwide…The Great Reset will dramatically expand the surveillance state via real-time tracking. It will also mandate that people receive digital certificates in order to travel and even technology implanted in their bodies to monitor them.”
Klaus Schwab, chairman of the World Economic Forum , a gathering of the world’s most powerful people which meets in Davos, Switzerland to discuss future trends and initiatives, is the mastermind of the “Great Reset.” In his July 2020 book “COVID-19: The Great Reset,” Schwab readily admits that COVID is a “mild” disease which nevertheless serves the purpose of instituting undreamed of controls over humanity.
“one of the least deadly pandemics the world has experienced over the last 2000 years…the consequences of COVID-19 in terms of health and mortality will be mild compared to previous pandemics”
Dr. Paul said in his article:
“The Great Reset involves a huge expansion of the welfare state via a universal basic income program. This can help ensure compliance with the Great Reset’s authoritarian measures….We are told the lockdowns are ordered because of a virus that poses no great danger to a very large percentage of the American public. Yet, instead of adopting a different approach, politicians are doubling down on the failed policies of masks and lockdowns. Meanwhile, big tech companies, which are already often acting as partners of government, silence anyone who questions the official line regarding the threat of coronavirus or the effectiveness of lockdowns, masks, and vaccines.”
Schwab and Bill Gates
Schwab and Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau
Bill Gates Fingerprints on all Aspects of COVID and New Control Technologies
As far back as April, Dr. Paul pointed out that Gates, a private citizen and not a doctor or scientist, has been the driving force behind worldwide forced vaccination programs for a decade. Gates says that “proof” of vaccination will be needed to allow life to go on as normal for individuals, saying in one interview last Spring:
“eventually there will be sort of this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global re-opening up.”
In one of Dr. Paul’s widely-viewed, regular online broadcasts, he pointed out that Gates was a key financial backer of a tattoo-like digital identification record which could store vast amounts of data on each person under the skin, readable by a scanner.
Fauci relentlessly pushed the most dehumanizing aspect of the COVID outbreak, masks, saying that if only everyone in the nation wore masks, 130,000 lives could be saved. What is not reported is that the study referred to by Fauci came out of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which is heavily funded by Bill Gates.
Masks severely hamper interpersonal connection and exchange of emotion, and reinforce a crisis atmosphere. It is difficult for people to connect, and perhaps organize a resistance, under mask and social distance rules.
in Belgium, a lawsuit is underway which names both Gates and Ferguson as defendants in a scheme to defraud the public by the criminal exploitation of the COVID crisis.
Despite a carefully crafted image that Gates is a late-life billionaire who is now giving away his fortune, Gates’ net worth has been steadily climbing as his giving has increased.
Yes, Gates Hurt Did Girls in India
In India, a committee of investigation found that thousands of girls, whose families were illiterate, were maimed by vaccine trials, funded by Gates, of Gardasil, an anti-HPV vaccine made by Merck, in which Gates had investments.
“The committee found that…In many other cases, thumbprint impressions of their poor and illiterate parents were duly affixed onto the consent form. The children also had no idea about the nature of the disease or the vaccine.”
Gates could be prosecuted on these ground alone, by any duly sworn prosecutor in any nation that is signatory to the Geneva Conventions.
Other uncanny connections tracing back to Gates:
a leaked memo shows Gate will not mandate COVID vaccinations for his own employees at Microsoft.
The FDA, which declares when vaccines are “safe,” owes half its annual budget to the pharmaceuticals industry.
In a remarkable conflict of interest, the World Health Organization, which guides pandemic response from policy on remedies such as Ivermectin to COVID testing, receives 10% to 13% of its funding, as much as the entire US donation, from one man, Bill Gates. who has been heavily invested in vaccine companies, including Pfizer and Moderna, for many years.
“Fact-check” websites which relentlessly keep the official COVID narrative on track, such as PolitiFact.com and FactCheck.org, coincidentally receive large funding from Gates through their parent organizations the Poynter Institute, and the Annenberg Foundation.
US health authorities have been actively promoting the long-term wearing of masks which are known to cause lung-damage due to containing the nano-material graphene. These have been banned in Canada.
Gates for his part keeps making predictions, and in December spoke as if COVID was just a dress rehearsal. Gates said, with an unseemly smirk, that there will soon be another pandemic, which “this time,” “WILL get attention.”
Dr. Paul’s Views Dovetail with HW Bush Administration Official Catherine Austin Fitts. Fitts Lays Out The Great Reset and How to Stop It
Catherine Austin Fitts is an investment banker and former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under President George HW Bush. Secretary Fitts describes how the push for a mandatory universal vaccination program is a gateway to global enslavement of most of humanity. In the following video, Fitts gives one of her most important interviews, exposing the “Great Reset.”
The number of possibly-linked deaths to Moderna’s and Pfizer’s COVID injections is now over 10,000, more than the number of deaths reported for all other vaccines combined, since the CDC reporting system (VAERS) began in 1990. Adverse events reported to VAERS are now over 500,000, many of them “life threatening” or resulting in “permanent disability.” Although the reported deaths are not proven to be linked, one-third of the deaths occurred within 48 hours, in one large sample.
As the walls close in on Fauci who is embroiled in evidence that he approved NIH funding for dangerous gain-of-function research at Wuhan lab, Chinese virologist and exile Dr. Li-Meng Chen defies the current media convention of referring to the scandal as a “lab leak,” implying an accident, rather than a deliberately engineered, deliberately released bio-weapon developed under orders from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP.)
Furthermore, Dr. Yan has said hidden characteristics have been built into the virus which are not immediately apparent. Dr. Yan said on Tucker Carlson recently:
After a year of relentless attacks by the media for her views, which rested on the premise that COVID was man-made, Dr. Yan has been roundly vindicated. Earlier this year she was joined by former CDC Director Redfield, who also decided COVID was made in a lab.
In January Fox News journalist and Hoover Institution Fellow Steve Hilton uncovered NIH grant documents which showed that Fauci had approved of funding for research that was banned in the US to Wuhan lab.
Last May 2020, General Jack Keane, a retired American four-star general, former Vice Chief of Staff of the Army and Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient, made news when he said that Chinese President Xi had “weaponized” the COVID virus:
“He has weaponized COVID-19….I mean, [Xi] actually used that disease to spread it around the world because he thought it would destroy Western democracies’ economies, and he’s been able to accomplish that,”
Last month, a senior intellectual within the Chinese Communist Party declared “victory” over the US in “biological war.”
“In 2020, China won the trade war, science & technology war, and especially the biological war. The achievement is unprecedented. This is an epoch-making historical record. So for the liberal, America-worshiping cult within China, their worship of the US is actually unfounded. After this trade war and biological warfare, the US was beaten back to its original shape.”
“ So I think Trump’s attempt to restore the declining international status of the US during his 4 years has failed.”
The video was released as Dr. Anthony Fauci faces calls for his resignation. Although Fauci has defended gain-of-function research, Dr. Li-Meng Chen says there is no reason to conduct such research which is not nefarious, and likened it to building and handing a child a “loaded gun.”
Below: Prof. Ping Chen, China “won…the biological war.” (view in Bitchute)
Coincidentally, last year it was revealed that Moderna had warned, in 2019 nine months before the pandemic, of a possible “deliberate release” of a deadly coronavirus (below.)
Coronavirus News 
