A widely hailed study which purports to show that heart problems, blood clots, and other maladies caused by COVID vaccines are “rare,” is based on data that the authors say they cannot “share” contrary to bedrock principles of science. Established norms requires that data be made freely available to other researchers in order for the data to be validated and used to reproduce the results.
“The researchers…said they did not have permission to share data from the study — meaning their conclusions cannot easily be verified or challenged by other researchers.“
The premier science journal Science, for example, states in its policies section:
“All data used in the analysis must be available to any researcher for purposes of reproducing or extending the analysis. Data must be available in the paper or deposited in a community special-purpose repository or a general-purpose repository such as Dryad (see Data and Code Deposition). “
Science further states:
“Problems in obtaining access to published data are taken seriously by the Science journals and can be reported at science_data@aaas.org.”
Below: Data policy statement from Science. (source)
In 2020 at the height of COVID, the prestigious Lancet was forced to retract a study purporting to show that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was ineffective in the treatment of Covid after it turned out the data was fraudulent. But not before the study caused most research on HCQ for COVID to be halted. Nevertheless, a compendium of all known studies on the use of HCQ in the treatment of COVID shows significantly reduced mortality when HCQ is used.
In the “largest” study ever done, 99 million people, even with all parameters stacked in the COVID vaccines’ favor, significant life-changing side effects from the vaccines were still found, but explained away as “rare.”
This is assuming the data is not totally fraudulent to begin with. A study which cannot show its data should never hit the light of day. In 2015 Richard Horton, long-time editor-in-chief of The Lancet, confessed “much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”
Children’s Health Defense reported in February 2024, in “CDC-Funded Study of 99 Million COVID-Vaccinated People Finds ‘Very Rare Adverse Events’”:
A study of adverse events in 99 million people vaccinated for COVID-19 found increased but “very rare” risks of neurological, blood and heart disorders. Myocarditis odds were over 6 times higher than normal after a second Moderna shot.
___
Most significantly, the limitation of data collection of only up to 42 days post-vaccination carries the likelihood of vast underreporting, especially for symptoms that may take longer to develop. For example, McCullough has reported cardiac arrests happening up to two years after vaccine administration.
Second, by red-flagging only those adverse events where researchers are 95% sure the vaccine makes them 1.5 times more likely, some real risks could slip through the cracks when it comes to further studies or the development of remedies.
Lower than “1.5 times more likely” still means higher-than-reported vaccine-related risks. While appropriately cautious, the validity of this statistical distinction merits further evaluation.
Third, the study did not analyze or report on deaths following COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers did not mention vaccine-induced mortality at all and only stated that additional studies are still warranted using methodologies better suited to assess different kinds of data.
Hooker said:
“The authors appear to sidestep the severity of COVID-19 vaccine AEs [adverse events] by avoiding reporting on ‘death,’ ‘hospitalization,’ and ‘serious injury’ associated with the reported conditions as well. These are notably missing and one wonders why they were omitted given the high mortality levels indicated through CDC’s VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System].”
Fourth, the datasets were not globally representative and contained a number of confounding factors. Data from the U.S., which had some of the worst COVID-19 outcomes and ample reporting of adverse events, were not included. Asia and Africa were completely unrepresented.
____
In the section declaring competing interests, some authors acknowledged receiving funding from the CDC directly, though they clearly stated the study’s conclusions were their own.
Some authors reported associations with or funding from other state or country-level health agencies, and relationships with Big Pharma companies such as Gilead Sciences (makers of remdesivir), Novo Nordisk, AbbVie, Sanofi, Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline.
The lead author of the study, K. Faksova, is employed by the Danish vaccine manufacturer Staten Serum Institut.
“This is a blatant conflict of interest,” Hooker said.
The researchers also said they did not have permission to share data from the study — meaning their conclusions cannot easily be verified or challenged by other researchers.
Safe and effective definition has been changed:
Largest Covid vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small increased risk of neurological, blood and heart disorders – but they are still extremely rare | Daily Mail Online https://t.co/cI0ERSSwRz
Above: Header for comprehensive depository of all known studies on use of Ivermectin to treat COVID, showing “statistically significant improvements” in majority of studies. Source: c19ivm.org
A US appeals court has ordered the FDA to retract its public statements and tweets saying that the popular Nobel Prize-winning drug Ivermectin is not effective against COVID and may be dangerous. The order was issued as part of a settlement of a lawsuit brought by doctors, one of whose licence was attacked by the Texas State Medical Board for refusing to halt prescription of Ivermectin in her treatment of her COVID patients.
Dr. Mary Bowden had her hospital privileges revoked at Houston Methodist Hospital in November 2021, after which she gave a press conference maintaining her practice was sound and saving her patients.
“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to take down its website and social media posts warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 under terms of a settlement reached Thursday in a lawsuit alleging the agency exceeded its authority when it directed health professionals and patients not to use the drug.
Within 21 days, the agency will remove the consumer update, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” which pictures a doctor and a horse. The FDA posted the update on March 5, 2021.
The FDA webpage, still live, states repeatedly that the FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for treating COVID-19 and warns the drug can be “unsafe.” The page also includes language warning people not to use ivermectin “intended for livestock.”
The FDA will also delete social media posts from Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram posted in 2021 and 2022 with messages such as “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.””
Below: FDA post on Twitter implying that Ivermetin was only for livestock
A compendium of existing scientific literature on the use of Ivermectin for COVID, c19ivm.org, has long reported since the start of COVID that when Ivermectin is used:
Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 61 of 101 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.”
“How much were beliefs in misinformation and trust in institutions associated with individuals’ use of non–evidence-based treatments for COVID-19, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine?”
Fauci August 29, 2021 on Ivermectin for COVID “Don’t do it” (view at Rumble)
In the summer of 2021, keeping the demonization of Ivermectin on-track, the Rolling Stone published what turned out to be a false story about Oklahoma emergency rooms being backed up with victims of Ivermectin.
“The FDA demonized ivermectin, which is a highly effective drug for the early treatment of COVID. The consequences of this, and what has to be clear is that this led directly to the death of millions of people,” Marik said. “So the FDA has blood on its hands.”
Critics of the US government’s announcement and response to COVID, including what Dr. Mary Bowden calls the “war on Ivermectin,” say the government was motivated by the need to ensure that no alternative treatments were available for COVID in order to gain FDA “emergency use authorization” and mass roll-out of the vaccines, including mandates which forced US service members, government employees, college students, and employees from large swaths of the economy to submit to the injections, which are now being called responsible for a large upswing in yearly deaths in the US and worldwide.
Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has been called a “conspiracy theorist” since the start of COVID and who has defended the use of Ivermectin, said last year:
“Tony Fauci’s problem is this: there’s a little known federal law that says, ‘You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.’ So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorization to the vaccines and they could have never gotten them approved,”
Unspoken by RFK Jr. in that statement is the conclusion that the lives of hundreds of thousands or millions of people who might have been saved by doctors like Mary Bowden mattered not a whit to Fauci, only the approval of the COVID vaccines.
But few doctors, although likely aware of Ivermectin’s efficacy since it was widely disseminated in medical circles, were as fearless as Bowden, or as committed to their patients.
Dr. Drew hosts Dr. Mary Bowden and Senator Dr. Rand Paul on medical deception during COVID (view at Rumble)
As time goes on information damning to governments and formerly trusted medical authorities trickles out at a steady rate, always roundly ignored by the major media which is complicit up to its ears in attacking medical dissenters and being part and parcel of the campaign to shame people who fear the shots or for whatever reason have decided not to take, now it is clear for good reason.
In September 2023, University of Ottawa mathematician Professor Denis Rancourt estimated that 17 million people worldwide have been killed by the COVID vaccines, and millions more have suffered life-altering disabilities.
In October 2022, Pfizer President of International Developed Markets, Janine Small, in a hearing before European Parliament, was asked by member MEP Rob Roos if the Pfizer vaccine was ever tested for the central justification for the social pressure to get vaccinated, “stopping the the spread,” i.e. transmission, of COVID.
“Was the Pfizer Covid vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?”
Small’s answer was “No.”
MEP Roos went on to blast government mandates for the drugs, calling the authorities “criminal.” Roos said:
“This is scandalous. Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth that ‘you do it for others.’ Now this turned out to be a cheap lie.”
Below: EU parliament member Rob Roos, October 2022, questioning Pfizer president (view at Rumble)
In March 2023, UK Health Minister Matt Hancock, the UK equivalent of Anthony Fauci, drew fire when leaked WhatsApp messages showed he and other high officials discussing the timing of the deployment of “the new variant” in order to continue scaring “the pants off everyone” and moving relentlessly toward the vaccines. The messages mocked the public for believing the narrative. They read in part:
“We frighten the pants of [sic] everyone with the new strain,” Mr Hancock agreed.
“Yep that’s what will get proper bahviour [sic] change,” Mr Poole said.
“When do we deploy the new variant,” Mr Hancock asked….
“Any idea how many people we locked up in hotels yesterday?”
Mr Hancock replied, “None. But 149 chose to enter the country and are now in Quarantine Hotels due to their own free will!”
“Hilarious,” Mr Case wrote back.
Other “COVID lies” alleged at Doctors 4 COVID Ethics, a site maintained by doctors and scientists, many of whom stand accused in the media of “misinformation,” are:
The infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2 is 0.1 – 0.3%, which is not significantly different from some seasonal influenza epidemics.
Based on the peer-reviewed articles, at least 30 to 50% of the population has prior cross-immunity.
SARS-CoV-2 does discriminate. “The lethality of this virus, as is common with respiratory viruses, is 1000X less in young, healthy people than in elderly people with multiple comorbidities.”
Asymptomatic transmission is the “central conceptual deceit” used to “underscore almost every intrusion: masking, mass testing, lockdowns, border restrictions, school closures, even vaccine passports.”
PCR test is “the central operational deceit.” [Another “lie” used during the COVID saga was the use of the PCR test to inflate cases, even though it was prone to many false positives. The New York Times reported in August 2020: “In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.. Most of these people are not likely to be contagious …”]
Neither cloth nor surgical masks prevent respiratory virus transmission.
Lockdown is “epidemiologically irrelevant” and never works. “Only “stay home if you’re sick” works.“
“Covid-19 is the most treatable respiratory viral illness ever”. Safe and effective early treatments are available.
Based on the peer-reviewed articles, very few clinically significant reinfections of SARS-Cov-2 have ever been confirmed.
SARS-CoV-2 mutates slowly, and no variant is even close to escaping naturally-acquired immunity. However, there is the possibility that the so-called vaccines prevent the establishment of immune memory, leading to the repeated infections, which would be a form of acquired immune deficiency.
Safety is the top priority in a public health mass intervention, even more than effectiveness. “It was NEVER appropriate to attempt to “end the pandemic” with a novel technology vaccine.”
The four gene-based “vaccines” are toxic. The basic rules of selecting vaccine candidates are: 1) the agent has no inherent biological action (non-toxic); 2) the agent should be the genetically most stable part of the virus; 3) the agent should be most different from human proteins. Spike protein as the vaccine does not fit any of the above criteria.
Disturbingly, by far the most serious allegation against the medical status quo and the forces which have made the lives of doctors like Mary Bowden living hell for the past three years is that none of this is accidental. Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer for 16 years, says the entire package of “lies” has been a program to force vaccines upon the world population which are “intentionally designed to harm people.”
Using simple, independent data approaches, mathematician and University of Ottawa Professor Denis Rancourt’s grim estimate of 17 million dead globally as a direct result of the novel, mRNA COVID vaccines stands up to scrutiny.
In the US, excess deaths since the 2021 COVID vaccine roll-out, through 2023, are about 1.57 million. Only 667,000 of these can be accounted for by COVID. This leaves 905,000 unaccounted for, non-COVID excess deaths. Worldwide since the vaccine roll-out, excess deaths which are not due to COVID are roughly 20 – 23 million.
In September 2023, University of Ottawa scientist Prof. Denis Rancourt estimated that 17 million people had so far been killed by the COVID vaccines. This is close to the number of excess, non-COVID deaths worldwide since the vaccine roll-out.
Excess deaths are the number of deaths which occur over and above what would be expected in normal times, which ordinarily varies very little from year to year.
In the US in the last quarter of 2021, excess deaths were up 40%, mostly among working age people. Life insurance executive Scott Davison, CE of insurance giant One America, said in January 2022:
“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic…So 40% is just unheard of.”
“The analysis by Rancourt et al. arrived at its conclusion by claiming that spikes in excess mortality in the post-vaccination period correlated to vaccine rollout. Apart from the fact that correlation alone cannot demonstrate a causal relationship, it neglected to account for the fact that these spikes in excess mortality corresponded to surges of COVID-19 deaths. This means that these spikes were very likely due to COVID-19, not the vaccines.”
However, there are not nearly enough COVID deaths to account for excess deaths either in the US or worldwide: 1.57 million excess deaths in the US since 2021 versus 667,000 COVID deaths, and 30 million excess deaths worldwide versus about 7 million COVID deaths.
The discrepancy has forced the media and medical establishment to invent such brand new diseases as “SADS,” or “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.”
In December 2023 former Pfizer Chief Science Officer (CSO) and Vice President, Dr. Mike Yeadon, alleged in a speech to the UK Parliament that the COVID vaccines were “designed intentionally to harm people”
In May 2023 renown pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt made a presentation at the EU Parliament, in which he showed autopsy findings which led him to conclude that the COVID vaccines were responsible for many of the excess deaths now being witnessed. In the US and globally for 2021, 2022, and 2023, the number of all-cause deaths over and above normal levels is about 20%, the vast majority not from COVID.
Links to doctors’ calls for halts to mass “vaccinations,” partial list: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Data sources for above charts 1, 2, 3,4.
Pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. (view at Rumble) (Presentation slides)
Warning about the toxicity of the COVID vaccines are nothing new, but have been heavily censored. In an interview with The New American in April 2021, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor emeritus of the University of Mainz and winner of the Aronson Prize for achievements in microbiology and immunology, warned that the COVID “vaccines” were set to“decimate world population.”
Fits-Like-Glove Correlations Between Vaccination Rates and Excess Deaths in Many Countries
In many countries, uncanny correlations can be seen between rates of vaccination, and rates of excess mortality.
Below: Timeline of excess deaths and COVID vaccination rates in various countries. Source(CLICK ON IMAGE FOR LARGER IMAGE)
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, an outspoken Ohio physician, says “They have found a way to slow-kill people.” Dr. Tenpenny’s medical license was attacked by the Ohio Medical Board in 2021 and has had her license suspended for saying some COVID vaccines contained magnetic substances. But in August 2021, the government of Japan pulled 1.6 million doses of the Moderna COVID vaccine as the result of “a substance that reacts to magnets.”
In the US, excess deaths since the 2021 COVID vaccine roll-out, through 2023, are about 1.57 million. Only 667,000 of these can be accounted for by COVID. This leaves 905,000 unaccounted for, non-COVID excess deaths. Worldwide since the vaccine roll-out, excess deaths which are not due to COVID are around 20 million.
In September 2023, a University of Ottawa scientist Prof. Denis Rancourt, who Dr. Yeadon cites in his speech, estimated that 17 million people had so far been killed by the COVID vaccines. This is close to the number of non-COVID excess deaths since the vaccine roll-out.
Excess deaths are the number of deaths which occur over and above what would be expected in normal times, which varies very little from year to year.
In October 2022 Professor Spiro Pantazatos, a clinical neurobiologist and researcher at Columbia University Medical Center, appeared on Dr. Drew to explain his estimate that, as of August 2021, the true death toll for the COVID vaccines in the US was up to 187,000, perhaps more.
A popular “fact check” in the site Health Feedback, which is funded by openly pro-COVID-vaccine Facebook founder Mark Zuckerman, and China-owned Tik Tok, argues that COVID deaths could explain the large number of excess deaths seen worldwide. But there are not nearly enough of them: 1.57 million excess deaths in the US since 2021 versus 667,000 COVID deaths, and 30 million excess deaths worldwide versus about 7 million COVID deaths.
The discrepancy has forced the media and medical establishment to invent such brand new diseases as “SADS,” or “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.”
Prof. Rancourt has controversially said “there was no pandemic” in the run-up to severe lockdown measures being declared around the world. Supporting his statement, data shows that although the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the pandemic on March 11, 2020, in many countries, including the US, there were no significant excess deaths, and there were even negative excess deaths, even up until March 8th (see chart below.) Rancourt argues that the much of the spikes in deaths which followed were a result of government-imposed incentives to use inappropriate treatments on COVID patients such as Remdesivir, which even the WHO recommended against by October 2020, and immediate ventilator intubation, which was halted as a standard procedure by the end of 2020
Autopsies Showing COVID Vaccines Are Responsible Ignored or Buried
The official posture of the FDA is to simply ignore any science which runs counter to its claim that the shots are safe. In September 2022, the FDA refused to release anonymized autopsy reports requested through a Freedom of Information Act request by the Epoch Times, for all autopsies obtained by the FDA concerning any deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System following COVID-19 vaccination. Although the FDA and the medical establishment are fond of saying “correlation does not prove causation” when a COVID vaccination is followed by sudden death, when the opportunity arose to prove or disprove causation, the FDA buried the autopsies.
Since Dr. Yeadon’s speech, seven UK Ministers of Parliament have demanded, in an Open Letter to the UK government, data which “will provide definitive insight as to whether or not the covid vaccines are “safe and effective” or not.”
With the support of six other colleagues, I have written to Prof. Sir Ian Diamond to request that the ONS produce a detailed time-series cohort analysis like they should have done 3 years ago.
Below: Ex-Pfzer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon on Dr. Drew Show warning that the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines are extremely dangerous and make the whole body into a “spike protein factory.”
In May 2023 renown pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt made a presentation at the EU Parliament, in which he showed autopsy findings which led him to conclude that the COVID vaccines were responsible for many of the excess deaths now being witnessed. In the US and globally for 2021, 2022, and 2023, the number of all-cause deaths over and above normal levels is about 20%, the vast majority not from COVID.
Scientists Dr. Yeadon and Dr. Wodarg Say COVID Vaccine Batch Death Patterns Mirror “Dose Range-Finding”
Dr. Yeadon and Dr. Wodarg conclude that the vast and methodical differences in the number of deaths, permanent disabilities, and other “adverse events” associated with different batches of the vaccines, are deliberate. Each major vaccine, Janssen, Pfizer, and Moderna, shows a pattern resembling what they call “dose range finding,” a scientific method for discovering the toxicity of different concentrations of a substance.
Yeadon and Wodarg argue that these patterns cannot possibly be accidental, especially given the highly precise nature of drug manufacturing. Such wide variations in safety signals between batches would have caused any other drug to be pulled from the market.
Dr. Yeadon says that, given the history of lies from health authorities and governments surrounding the COVID saga, he has no choice but to conclude that the vaccines may be part of a long-term program to “kill people intentionally.”
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, an outspoken Ohio physician, says “They have found a way to slow-kill people.” Dr. Tenpenny’s medical license was attacked by the Ohio Medical Board in 2021 and has had her license suspended for saying some COVID vaccines contained magnetic substances. But in August 2021, the government of Japan pulled 1.6 million doses of the Moderna COVID vaccine as the result of “a substance that reacts to magnets.”
Yeadon famously publicly accused four of his former colleagues of Crimes Against Humanity and demanded they resign. So far two of them have.
The scientists show, in a presentation, what a random distribution of adverse events from a typical vaccine looks like, compared to the pattern of adverse events from the COVID vaccine batches.
The second chart below shows the number of adverse events in the Pfizer deployment of vaccine batches. The vertical axis is number of adverse events, including deaths. The horizontal axis is the chronological deployment of batches, by batch issue date.
Figure 2. Below: Reported deaths by batch of COVID mRNA injection, earlier batches first. ( Click for larger image)
“Dose Range Finding”
Upon examining the data, originally brought to light by Craig Paardekooper, Dr. Yeadon said that, as a pharmaceuticals scientist, he immediately recognized a process called “dose range finding.” In dose range finding, varying strengths of dosage are administered in order to accurately peg the number of deaths and injuries which can be associated with each dosage level. “Maximum tolerable dose” is what does not kill the test animal immediately. One of Dr. Yeadon’s specialties at Pfizer was toxicology, which involves these methods.
“A dose-ranging study is a clinical trial where different doses of an agent (e.g., a drug) are tested against each other to establish which dose works best and/or is least harmful. However, in the case of the experimental Covid injections this is being used for the opposite reasons: to establish which dose is most harmful.”
As can be seen in Figure 2, batch deadliness forms a progressive line sloping downward, as if early batches start out at high dosage strength, killing many, and then are cut down in a methodical manner. Yeadon and Wodarg say this would never happen unless planned this way, since drugs are manufactured to be the same dose and formula across thousands of batches and billions of doses, with an extraordinarily high level of precision. The miracle of modern pharmacology is that billions of pills of a product, like aspirin, are exactly the same strength to many decimal places.
Dr. Yeadon noted that companies like Pfizer, for which he was once a Vice President, and Chief Science Officer (CSO) are very good at this. Therefore the wide variance in batch deadliness can only be deliberate. Moreover, a data pattern like this in the CDC’s VAERS reports should have triggered the FDA to bring all COVID mRNA vaccines to a halt long ago.
Dose-range-finding would allow one to estimate how many deaths can be expected for a particular dosage strength, within a certain period of time. Wodarg, Yeadon, and others express being stunned at the logical conclusion, that a massive long-term depopulation program may be underway.
COVID Vaccines Set Up to “Kill People Intentionally”?
Despite the qualifications of Dr. Yeadon and Dr. Wodarg, the FDA has not given an explanation for the data.
The findings have been met by dead silence in the media, though the accuracy of the findings has never been challenged.
In the interview with attorney Reiner Fuellmich, who in the past brought successful lawsuits against Deutsche Bank and Volkswagon, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg says:
“It is not true that there is the same stuff in each shot,”
Dr. Wodarg says:
“Now is the time they can do it because we are afraid…it is worse than Nuremberg…and they kill people…intentionally.”
In 2010 as head of the Council of Europe Health Committee, Dr. Wodarg led an inquiry into the controversial 2009 Swine Flu “pandemic.”
Dr. Mike Yeadon says:
“if you harboured any residual doubts about whether there is or not a depopulation agenda, this presentation destroys that doubt.”
Dr. Yeadon said in the interview:
“I am worried that this is the calibration of a killing weapon…I have got no reason to make this stuff up. I’ve never been a conspiracy theorist,”
“You’ll be aware that one of our assiduous researchers noticed a short while ago that adverse events are not occurring randomly throughout the batches & lots of vaccines made by a given manufacturer.
Instead, it appears that just 5% of the batches / lots are associated with almost all the deaths.
Given the tight requirements of consistency associated with an authorised product, it’s absolutely impossible that this is a chance event.”
New Rules for COVID Vaccines, from “Prove That it’s Safe” to “Prove That it’s Not Safe”
The most often heard defense of the novel vaccines in the face of millions of “adverse events” worldwide is that “correlation does not equal causation,” like a mantra programmed into a cult victim. The problem is, in the science of clinical drug trials, it does. The burden is always on the innovator to prove to the FDA and the public that the drug is safe if someone dies. The burden is not on the public agencies to prove that it is not safe. But with the COVID products, the FDA has thrown out every principle of good science.
In 2016, the FDA halted clinical trials of a new cancer drug after just three participant deaths, even though causation was not proven before the trials were suspended. The presumption was “better safe than sorry” until the issue of causation was settled.
Below: Screenshot, Gizmodo headline, 2016, trials suspended after just three deaths (source)
In August of 2021, the FDA halted trials of a gene therapy for a neurological disorder, after a participant developed a bone marrow disease. Although the therapy was not proven as the cause, the FDA acted, it said, “out of an abundance of caution.”
And in 1976 the Swine Flu vaccine roll-out was halted after well under 100 unexplained deaths were reported, which were not conclusively proven to be related, after 40 million Americans had been vaccinated.
The FDA’s “abundance of caution” is now an abundance of “reckless,” in the words of Dr. Yeadon. Over what is, in the words of even Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF,) “one of the least deadly pandemics the world has experienced over the last 2000 years.”
Professor Spiro Pantazatos, a clinical neurobiologist and researcher at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, appeared on Dr. Drew last October 2022 to explain his estimate that, as of August 2021, the true death toll for the COVID vaccines in the US was up to 187,000, and perhaps more. At this rate, given the time elapsed since then, now the total would be much higher. (Also see Prof. Pantazatos interview with Childrens’ Health Defense)
Daily COVID deaths in US between September 2021 and October 2022. Source: Worldometers
Pfizer Admits COVID Vaccines Do Not Stop Transmission from Person to Person
This October, in a European Parliament hearing, it was admitted by a Pfizer president that the vaccine never did and was never tested for stopping the transmission of COVID from person to person. The admission wrecked one of the central articles of faith, stressed by the likes of Anthony Fauci and Rachel Maddow, behind the push for vaccination: that if you were not doing it for yourself, you were doing it for others.
Fauci touted the vaccines as having the ability to stop transmission, so that anyone taking it would become a “dead end” to the virus.
Vaccine Recipients Can See How Many “Adverse Events” Their Batch is Associated With
Anyone can find out the number of deaths and adverse events associated with the batch of the vaccine they have taken at How Bad is My Batch.
Numbers do Not Convey the Human Cost to Date
Facts and figures, however, do not convey the human cost of COVID vaccine injuries and deaths, which have been hidden from the public by the major media as it continues to push the “safe and effective” narrative.
One website which catalogues the stories of victims is Real Not Rare. Real Not Rare also runs a Facebook page. In June of 2022, to no media coverage, people who had suffered serious injuries upon taking the COVID vaccines gathered for a rally in Los Angeles. On December 7, 2022, US Senator Ron Johnson held a roundtable discussion in Washington DC entitled “COVID-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work, and Possible Causes of Injuries” (see videos below.) In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis has initiated hearings and possible legal action to hold COVID vaccines makers “accountable” for harm.
A judge in Texas is set to decide whether to dismiss a Pfizer Whistleblower case charging “failure to report participant deaths” and “fabrication” of data, or move to the discovery phase of a trial.
The Real Anthony Fauci (version here contains Romanian subtitles but is in English.) (View at Rumble)
How it All Fits Together: Vaccine Mandates, Vax Passports, and the Great Reset, Starring Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF)(view at Rumble)
Internationally known pathology professors have concluded that there is a direct link between the COVID vaccines and many sudden, unexpected deaths, especially in younger age people not near the end-of-life years.
Two of these pathologists are Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Dr. Walter Lang.
Dr. Arne Burkhardt has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals, and has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.
Prof. Dr. Walter Lang was a pathologist at the Hannover Medical School from 1968-1985. Afterwards, for 25 years, Lang directed a private institute for pathology, which he founded, specializing in transplant pathology, extragynecological cytology, thyroid tumors, and lung/pleural pathology.
Dr. Arne Burkhardt
Dr. Walter Lang
In a German pathology conference series which began in September of 2021, Doctors Burkhardt and Lang reported never-before-seen immune system attacks on the body’s own organs. That primary conference is shown in the video below.
Below: September 20th, 2021, Conference at Pathological institute in Reutlingen, Germany, “Cause of death after COVID-19 vaccination & Undeclared components of the COVID-19 vaccines“(view at Rumble)
The Epoch Times reported on September 22, 2021 (click on Google translate from German to English):
“The doctors suspect autoimmune phenomena, reduction in immune capacity, acceleration of cancer growth, vascular damage “endothelitis”, vasculitis, perivasculitis and erythrocyte “clumping” as further corona vaccination side effects with potential fatal consequences…Burkhardt described it as “extreme” that among the ten deceased examined, three very rare autoimmune diseases were found, namely Sjögren’s syndrome, leukoclasic vasculitis of the skin and Hashimoto’s disease.”
“[Burkhardt] can only think of one term for what [he] has been investigating with his colleagues over the past few months – “lymphocyte amok”, potentially in all tissues and all organs.“
In it’s official statement on the autopsy findings, Doctors for COVID Ethics, a co-sponsor of the symposium, writes:
“A natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) will in most individuals remain localized to the respiratory tract. In contrast, the vaccines cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature. Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. This may occur in any organ. We are seeing now that the heart is affected in many young people, leading to myocarditis or even sudden cardiac arrest and death….
We herewith present scientific evidence that calls for an immediate stop of the use of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. We first lay out why the agents cannot protect against viral infection. While no positive effects can be expected, we show that the vaccines can trigger self-destructive processes that lead to debilitating illness and death….
Even early in the vaccine roll-out, scientists like Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor emeritus of the University of Mainz, winner of the Aronson Prize for achievements in microbiology and immunology, worried about what the spike proteins would do once turned loose in the body. In the below video Dr. Bhakdi gives a clear and lucid explanation of the mechanism by which the spike proteins might cause mischief.
VIDEO: 2nd Pathology Conference, December 4, 2021, “2nd Pathology Conference – ARE DEATHS AND ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS AFTER VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19 RELATED IN A PATHOLOGICALLY DETECTABLE WAY?“(view at Odysee)
CDC Fudges Data in Order to Make COVID Vaccines Appear Safer
Apparently seeking to blunt autopsy studies by pathologists, a study by scientists affiliated with Kaiser Permanente, in contrast, concludes that vaccinated persons have lower, non-COVID, all-cause death rates than unvaccinated persons.
The Kaiser study would seem to throw cold water on the idea that the vaccines are killing people. But the study employs a critical deception.
Rather than count from the time that the shot begins to have effects on the body, which would be immediately, a person who is negatively impacted is not counted as being vaccinated until 14 days after the second shot in the case of Pfizer and Moderna, or 14 days after the J&J single shot. This is particularly deceptive because 80% of VAERS reports of unexpected deaths post-vaccine occur within 14 days after taking a shot.
A CDC advisory on breakthrough COVID infections, which means infections in vaccinated people, shows that a person is considered “vaccinated” only after 14 days have passed since the final shot:
“a vaccine breakthrough infection is defined as the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in a respiratory specimen collected from a person ≥14 days after receipt of all recommended doses of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine.”
Children’s Health Defense reports that one-third of unexpected deaths after vaccination takes placewithin 48 hours, after receiving a shot.
This means that anyone who took a COVID vaccine shot, walks out, and falls over dead in the parking lot of a heart attack or stroke is counted as a death of an “unvaccinated” person.
COVID Vaccine Injury Claims in Compensation Court Now Many Times More Than For All Other Vaccines Combined, Animal Safety Trials All but Skipped
COVID vaccine injury claims have recently skyrocketed to 5400. The CDC’s VAERS Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System now has seven times the reported deaths possibly caused by the COVID vaccines as all other vaccines combined since the reporting system was created 30 years ago.
The COVID vaccines are already unprecedented for bypassing the normal one to three years of animal safety trials in vaccine and drug development which are typical before a new drug ever enters a human, in human clinical trials. The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to general use is 10 years.
COVID Vaccine-Injured Hold Rally in L.A (More info)
Unreported by Media, Younger People are Dying at Unprecedented Rates
Recent insurance company data for the US and other countries shows an unprecedented rise in all-cause mortality since the roll-out of the COVID vaccines, as much as 40%. This would put the US on track for 1.4 million more deaths of all causes than usual by the end of 2022. Normally about 3 million people die in the US in recent years.
“The director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, has carried out over forty autopsies on people who died within two weeks of receiving a Covid-19 vaccine and has expressed alarm over his findings.
Schirmacher stated that 30 to 40 per cent of people he examined died from the vaccine and that in his opinion, the frequency of fatal consequences of vaccinations is “underestimated.”…He has warned that the high number of unreported cases of vaccination deaths is partially due to the fact that “pathologists do not notice anything about most of the patients who die after and possible from a vaccination.”
German News Site Augsburg General (right-click to use Google translate from German to English):
“The doctor now wants to get to the bottom of the rare, serious side effects of vaccination – such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases. The problem from his point of view: Vaccinated people usually do not die under clinical observation. “The doctor examining the corpse does not establish any context with the vaccination and certifies a natural death and the patient is buried,” reports Schirmacher. “Or he certifies an unclear manner of death and the public prosecutor sees no third-party fault and releases the body for burial.””
“Despite the criticism, Schirmacher did receive support from his own ranks, and the Federal Association of German Pathologists stated that more autopsies of vaccinated people who died within a certain time frame after vaccination should be performed….The Federal Association of Pathologists already requested this in March in a letter to Health Minister Jens Spahn (CDU), but it went unanswered.”
Another pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole, MD, who holds medical degrees from Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, has made similar warnings about the vaccines. Dr. Cole shows his own lab evidence that Pfizer and Moderna mRNA spike protein injections may be quietly killing injection recipients through “micro-clots,” inflammation, and immune suppression.
Below: Dr. Ryan Cole, pathologist, on the dangers of mRNA injection in August 2021 (view at Bitchute)
In June of 2021, enlisting the aid of certain doctors and scientists, the media launched into attack mode immediately after a Canadian immunologist warned that the Pfizer/Moderna injections might pose a danger to the body’s organs, in particular the heart, brain, and through blood clotting issues.
Soon, the Internet was rife with “debunks” of Dr. Bridle’s concerns. A Reuters “fact check” proclaimed “There is no proof that spike proteins created in response to mRNA vaccines are harmful to the body, scientists have told Reuters.”
An anonymous Internet user even created a website using Dr. Bridle’s name, ByramBridle.com, and made the doctor and immunology professor out to be a “quack.” Thus an all-out campaign with unknown funding sources was at work smearing Dr. Bridle.
Dr. Peter McCullough completed his medical degree at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, and did his internal medicine residency at the University of Washington, then went on to obtain a master’s degree in public health at the University of Michigan. He has published on a range of topics with over 1000 publications and over 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine. His works have appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, and the British Medical Journal. Dr. McCullough has made presentations at the New York Academy of Sciences, the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency.
Dr. McCullough said:
“It is beyond any shadow of a doubt that the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths…It’s unequivocal, and I’m a card-carrying epidemiologist. I’m telling you, the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths,”
Dr. McCullough explains how scientists evaluate cause and effect:
“The epidemiological construct that we have to go through is called the ‘Bradford Hill Tenets of Causality.’ So, the first question is: ‘is it a large epidemiologic signal?’ And I’ll tell you – it’s astronomical. All of the vaccines combined in the United States per year – its no more than 150 deaths, not temporally related.
Here [with the Covid vaccine] we are at over 21,000 deaths. So clearly its a massive signal.
The third criteria: ‘is it internally consistent? Are there other conditions that are now acknowledged that they themselves could be fatal?’ And the answer is sure. With myocarditis, the FDA agrees – all the regulatory experts agree – that the vaccines cause myocarditis. Can it be fatal? Yes. Have there been fatal cases published? Yes… There are over 200 peer reviewed publications of myocarditis.
How about other forms of death? vaccine induced thrombosis, blood clots, stroke, hypertension, myocardial infection – a variety of other lethal syndromes. There’s over 1,000 peer reviewed published on fatal and non fatal outcomes [in regard to the Covid vaccine]. So that criteria is met. It’s internally consistent.”
An excellent video with Prof. Norman Fenton of Queen Mary University on how flawed data and definitions are used to fool the public is HERE.
Below: “Dr. Peter McCullough: “Beyond Any Shadow of a Doubt,” The Vaccines Are Causing Death” (view at Rumble)
Dr. Lang Resigns from Professional Association Citing “Corruption” and Cover-Up
In the December 4th presentation of the series, the pathologists said they had shown their findings to the leaders of their professional organizations, but had encountered what could only be described as “corruption.” Professor Dr. Walter Lang showed his letter of resignation from the German Pathological Association, of which he was an early member, in protest of this “corruption.”
Dr. Lang concluded that the leader of the group was interested only in “burying” his findings, “along with the dead.”
Dr. Lang said the medical establishment was now “monstrous.” He said that UK data showed people who had been vaccinated were more likely to catch COVID than those who had not, referencing the chart below, and that “vaccination is useless, it doesn’t protect you.” (Other sources, vaccinated vs. unvaccinated cases and deaths)
Below: Chart presented in September 20 Pathology Conference, showing COVID positive tests in UK per 100,000 in population for a recent time period, vaccinated (RED BARS) versus unvaccinated (BLUE BARS), for different age ranges. In lowest ages range, under 18, data is limited.
Pathologists’ Findings Follow Years of Dissident Doctors and Scientists Calling for Complete Halt to COVID Vaccine Roll-Outs
The findings in the German pathology series come after doctors and scientists have long called for a halt to the mass roll-out of the substances long before Phase III clinical trials are complete, which is at the earliest the end of 2022, and say that too little is known about the mRNA spike protein”s long-term effects in the body. [Links to doctors’ calls for halts to mass “vaccinations,” partial list: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. ]
Pfizer has requested in the past that the clinical trials data for it’s COVID injection be kept hidden from public view for 75 years. Hospitals take in an average of $160,000 extra per COVID case from the US government. And in his new book, The Real Anthony Fauci, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reveals that high FDA officials are allowed to owns parts of patents on the very drugs they are charged with regulating, and can keep up to $150,000 per year in royalties, for life.
“There’s no word to express this. If they don’t start doing something, they’re going to be in real trouble because let us state this very clearly. These agents are in experimental stage of use. There is an iron law saying that if you are introducing a medicine or an agent into the body of a person under experimental conditions, then you must always assume that if anything happens to the patient, it is the new agent that is causing it. And you are obliged to go and find out. You are not allowed to turn away, you are not allowed to turn away.”
Best estimates are that COVID is a 99.8% recovery rate virus, similar to flu, according to Stanford epidemiologist Dr. John Ioannadis. Common flu is 99.9%.
In December 2022, a peer-reviewed study in the second oldest medical publication in the world, the British Medical Journal, said unequivocally that for every person that the Covid shots kept out of the hospital, they put nearly 20 others in the hospital, or killed them. The BMJ said the COVID shots were:
“likely to cause net expected harms to young healthy adults—for each hospitalisation averted we estimate approximately [18.5 serious adverse events]…“
The BMJ study also said that the risk of heart damage from the shots is more than the risk of heart damage from COVID, especially in young men:
“Postvaccination myocarditis has been found to be equivalent to or exceed the risk of post-COVID myocarditis in males less than 40 years old…”
The BMJ study says that “University booster mandates are unethical.”
A Columbia University professor vetted and appearing on Dr. Drew concludes from his study of multiple data sets that COVID “vaccine” deaths in the US are in the hundreds of thousands. Columbia University Professor Spiro Pantazatos found that: “Significant regression terms estimate 130K-180K US deaths can be attributed to vaccination between February and August of 2021.”
A former Wall Street investment manager at the world’s largest investment house Blackrock, in his book “Cause Unknown”, concludes from life insurance data that the true number of Covid vaccine deaths since the start of 2021 is in the hundreds of thousands.
In October of 2021, the peer-reviewed science journal Toxicology Reports published a study which estimated that deaths directly caused by the vaccines “could be in the hundreds of thousands for the USA.” In a highly unusual incident, the paper was hastily retracted by the publisher, against the wishes of the authors, who to this day stand by their conclusions.
Although it may be hard to fathom, this is not the worst of the news ignored by the Pfizer media. In January of 2022, a former VP and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer, and a former chairman of the Council of Europe Health Committee, reported evidence of “dose-range-finding.” This is a way of perfecting a bioweapon used to kill people. The scientists conclude reluctantly that, based on patterns shown in the CDC’s own data, the vaccines were designed to “kill people intentionally.”
Since the “roll out” of the “vaccines,” a number of noteworthy, well-sourced documentaries by highly regarded filmmakers have been made, among them “Anecdotals” and “Safe and Effective”. These chronicle the journeys of people gravely debilitated by the Pfizer and Moderna COVID shots, yet they have received zero attention by any major channels, nor even write-ups by the major newspapers.
Fauci Admits PCR COVID Tests Do Not Measure Illness or Contagiousness
Anthony Fauci has made the shocking assertion, on MSNBC, that a positive COVID test of the kind which has driven nations to abrogate their most basic constitutional rights – and divided immediate families – means nothing in terms of public health.
Fauci said just before the New Year, on Dec. 29, 2021:
“PCR doesn`t measure replication-competent virus. It measures viral particles, nucleic acid. So in other words, I could be infected, have cleared the replication competent virus from me, but I can continue to be positive with a PCR for several days after recovering and not being transmissible at all.
The only way you can tell if it`s transmissible, if you can show that there really is live replication virus in you. And the tests don`t measure that.“
Thus in one fell swoop, Fauci undermined the basis for quarantine for a 99.8% recovery rate illness, which like flu strikes down overwhelmingly end-of-life elderly, and admitted that the basis for “lockdowns,” and media alarms preparing the public for more of them, are junk. Some scientists have long attempted to explain that the PCR test only shows the presence of at least a minute fragment of a virus, as someone who has long recovered might have.
In 2020 the president of Tanzania famously sent a sample to a lab to be PCR-tested for COVID, without telling the lab what the sample was. It came back positive. The sample was of a paw paw fruit.
“Tony Fauci does not mind going on television, in front of the people that pay his salary, and lie directly into the camera.”
Nevertheless, the media still sounds ominous warnings about cases of COVID “variants” rising or falling, flexing the muscles of emergency powers claimed by governments as a permanent “new normal.”
Winner of Nobel Prize for invention of PCR test Dr. Kary Mullis, Fauci “does not mind going on television” and lying (watch at Rumble)
French Attorney Working with Reiner Fuellmich Arrested and Released, is Working on Crimes Against Humanity Charges Against Bill Gates, Fauci, Schwab, Others
The attorney, Virginie de Araujo Recchia, is on a team of lawyers led by attorney Reiner Fuellmich, widely known for successful lawsuits against Deutsche Bank and Volkswagon. Recchia was arrested on March 22 without charges and then released days later, after international outcry.
Fuellmich has filed a complaint charging Crimes Against Humanity at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, focusing on the British government but with possible subpoena powers of nationals in other countries. The ICC has assigned the docket number OTP-CR-473/21.
Among the charges made in the ICC complaint are:
“The number of covid-19 cases have been artificially inflated due to the inaccuracy and unreliability of the PCR testing…”
“a further way that the Covid-19 statistics have been artificially inflated is by the ‘rebranding’ of the common influenza, pneumonia and other respiratory infections as covid -19. “
“Massive short-term damage and death from the ‘vaccines’. “
Proven increase in spontaneous abortion after a Covid m-RNA ‘vaccination. A recent study in the New England Medical Journal showed 8 in 10 women had a miscarriage after taking a Covid ‘vaccine’ before the third trimester (Appendix 25)
the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-19 amounts to murder and warrants a full investigation by the court.
Soon after Virginie de Araujo Recchia was arrested by French police at her home, her supporters put out the following press release.
“[Translation]: We are informing you that the lawyer M. Virginie de Araujo-Recchia was arrested this morning and placed in custody. We don’t fully know the circumstances under which such a measure was decided and what she is being charged with. We have been trying since this morning to determine where she has been taken. All our efforts in this regard have so far been in vain. Thanks for circulating this message, without changing a single word. We’ll keep you informed as soon as possible.“
“Any package, pallet or container can now be equipped with a sensor, transmitter or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag that allows a company to track where it is as it moves through the supply chain—how it is performing, how it is being used, and so on….In the near future, similar monitoring systems will also be applied to the movement and tracking of people.”— Klaus Schwab, author of The Great Reset, founder of the World Economic Forum, in his book “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”
Three months after police in New Zealand raided the home of health ministry whistleblower who leaked anonymized data on COVID vaccine, seven UK Ministers of Parliament have formally demanded that the UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) answer specific, on-going questions about the high number of deaths apparently linked to COVID vaccines. Then letter was penned by MP Andrew Bridgen who recently gave a speech which went viral worldwide, in which he made a case with hard evidence and data that the COVID vaccines are behind unprecedented world deaths rates, averaging about 20% higher than pre-2020 death rates, and long after COVID has subsided.
With the support of six other colleagues, I have written to Prof. Sir Ian Diamond to request that the ONS produce a detailed time-series cohort analysis like they should have done 3 years ago.
Below is the text of the letter as attached in the tweet above.
To: Professor Sir Ian Diamond, National Statistician and Chief Executive, UK Statistics Authority
2nd March 2024
Dear Professor Diamond,
We applaud the UK ONS for producing a number of time-series cohort analyses which looked at vaccinated and unvaccinated people over time since vaccination to determine whether or not the covid vaccines are safe. These can be found at ‘Deaths by Vaccination status, England’ on the ONS website.
Unfortunately, the parameters chosen by the Authority are insufficient to make a dispositive determination as to whether the vaccines are “safe and effective” or not because the interval sizes were too few and too large. The UK Statistics Regulator agrees and said, “Our view is that the Deaths by Vaccination Status publication does not provide information on vaccine effectiveness or vaccine safety and should not be used in this way.”
We are requesting that the Authority re-do the analysis with the following parameters which we believe will provide definitive insight as to whether or not the covid vaccines are “safe and effective” or not. Thiswill help us to address an important question we are currently facing in Parliament regarding excess mortality and what is causing it.
These parameters have been used on the records in New Zealand and the results were made public and no person has claimed it revealed any personal information because it simply aggregates statistics. We truncated the records requested at 100 years in order to preserve privacy (so 100+ are aggregated).
Your staff was asked to produce such a detailed report and they declined to do so. This is why we are bringing this matter to your attention.
The report that we request requires little effort: just changing the parameters in the code your team has already written and re-running the report. It does not expose anyone’s private health information.
Here are the column names and definitions:
Here are the column names for the weekly counts and definitions:
To produce the report, please use weekly tallying where you run through all of the records once per week (rather than once per day) in order to determine the value to tally for each person. So if a person dies mid-week, it would tally as a death for that week and the alive count would be 0; it is not necessary to tally fractional man-weeks. Each living person should tally to exactly one count bucket for a given observation week until death.
Age is the age of the person at the time the record is tallied which presumably is no different than the way you are doing it today.
Also note that the proportion of total deaths that were included in the data in 2023 was significantly lower than that in the releases for 2021 and 2022, despite the delay in the release meaning there were many months for registrations to have caught up. Please ensure that all deaths are included in the analysis.
If you have any questions or objections to the above request, please reach out to my office. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Yours Sincerely,
Andrew Bridgen MP, Dame Andrea Jenkyns MP, Sir Robert Syms MP, The Rt. Hon. Sammy Wilson MP, Neale Hanvey MP, Philip Hollobone MP, Jonathan Lord MP
Above: Canadian 2022 anti-COVID vaccine mandate truckers convoy
Two years after Canadian truckers protested mandates for vaccines whose safety and effectiveness are now hotly debated, facial recognition technology is being quietly rolled out, without opposition from Congress, which would have allowed World Economic Forum “Young Global Leader” Justin Trudeau to shut down the truckers’ and supporters’ bank accounts with the flip of a switch in 2022.
The WEF, an unelected billionaire’s club founded by Klaus Schwab, has made no secret of its desire for totalitarian controls in America and across the planet. In his book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Schwab wrote:
“Any package, pallet or container can now be equipped with a sensor, transmitter or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag that allows a company to track where it is as it moves through the supply chain—how it is performing, how it is being used, and so on….In the near future, similar monitoring systems will also be applied to the movement and tracking of people.”
As it were, Trudeau was forced to undertake the cumbersome legal process of declaring a “state of emergency,” then obtaining court orders to unleash police action on protesters’ finances. Not only the truckers, but anyone who had donated to the truckers, or who were seen in the vicinity giving them food, or who donated to their wildly popular GoFundMe page.
Trudeau was road-testing a new form of totalitarian controls beyond old-fashioned police head-busting, which also was deployed, in the name of “protecting public health” with vaccines which are now under fire in many nations’ parliaments, in lawsuits, and from thousands of censored doctors and scientists.
Now the Department of Homeland Security TSA is officially discriminating between people who surrender personal biometric data such as face recognition video selfies, and people who have thus far declined. The technology was pioneered by Bill Gates and his foundation and is promoted as a kind-hearted effort to extend “inclusivity” to poor people who cannot open bank accounts, or avail themselves of government services.
Unreported in the mainstream media, in March and April of 2020 Gates funded the British professor, Neil Ferguson, who wrote the paper, “Report 9,” on which governments based “lockdown” decrees. Also unreported, Gates was a key funder of the so-called WHO Solidarity Trials, which overdosed COVID patients with hydroxychloroquine in order to show that the drug was useless or worse in the treatment of COVID. This in turn paved the way for hasty FDA approval of the mRNA vaccines.
There has been no outcry demanding digital ID, as people have been living without bank accounts, and have been receiving government services around the world just fine in the past.
What universal facial recognition-based digital ID would be very good at, however, is identifying troublemakers, i.e. protesters of any ilk, and shutting them off without a penny with no need for messy court orders. That is because such IDs will eventually link to everything, if we allow it, including bank accounts.
The system would hand the Justin Trudeaus of the world their wildest dream.
“The U.S Transportation Security Administration is advancing face biometrics checks for members of its PreCheck program in partnership with airlines.
The implications of the new TSA PreCheck Touchless ID service for Clear and its membership-based airport biometrics service are unclear.
Delta and United Airlines are each piloting processes to replace boarding pass and physical ID document checks with face biometrics
United supports PreCheck Touchless ID for bag drops at O’Hare International in Chicago, and for security checks at O’Hare and Los Angeles International (LAX). Passengers can opt into the process by submitting selfie biometrics through United’s mobile app.”…The agency has expanded its acceptance of mobile driver’s licenses and other forms of digital ID, and intends to go further this year.
TSA is an agency of the Department of Homeland Security.
Above image, protester in Hong Kong, 2019, cutting down “smart” lamp post containing facial recognition cameras (source)
In 2020, after the World Health Organization’s declaration of a COVID pandemic, Bill Gates began promoting digital ID systems, and praised India as a leader in deploying the technology.
Gates said:
“…the cost of bank branches and paperwork it’s just too high but fortunately starting with countries like kenya and more recently…india we see that you can have digital financial inclusion…
so the role of the Gates Foundation as an advocate for those who don’t have access today is to make sure there’s technology and standards including open source work uh that we’re providing through the financial switch which is called mojo loop and through the digital identity system which is extremely valuable not just for financial activities but for health and voting and education…there isn’t going to be a one-size-fits-all solution what is the role that you see the private sector playing in being able to collaborate with different governments to ensure that we move forward well once you have the digital money system…”
The “digital money system” of which Gates was speaking is the other piece of the totalitarian nightmare being contemplated by the US government, which would be tied to a universal digital ID, Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
CBDC would replace all cash and private bank accounts with a system of debits and credits run by the Federal Reserve, which could then be linked to such abominations as a “social credit score,” such as the Chinese government maintains on almost all its citizens. In China social credit scores determine all facets of daily life, such as which schools one can attend, how far one can travel, what one can buy, and where one can go.
People who are determined to be engaging in “anti-social” behavior, such as the Canadian truckers protesting COVID vaccine mandates, can find their access to their own digital “money” summarily suspended, and left to starve.
Below: Digital ID pilot project created by Microsoft, of which Bill Gates is the founder (source)
Bill Gates promotes digital ID as necessary for “inclusion”
Among the states, California is forging ahead with a “federated” digital ID platform, which could be required to access any state government services such as unemployment benefits or even required to obtain state income tax refunds. Federated means it would eventually tie into a nationwide, universal system.
Below: Home page for State of California digital ID efforts (source)
“The World Bank and other international organizations must immediately stop any and all activities that promote harmful models of digital identification systems (digital ID) anywhere in the world.
Through an open letter, Access Now, Privacy International, NYU researchers, and other civil society organizations are calling on the World Bank to cease supporting unchecked digital ID systems that enable surveillance, exclusion, and discrimination.”
And of the sure-to-be-linked CBDC system, none other than the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, warns of CBDC’s danger to democracy. Kashkari says CBDC would allow the federal government to “monitor every one of your transactions.”
Says Kashkari:
“I get why China would be interested. Why would the American people be for that?”
The stakes of allowing China-style totalitarianism to take hold could not be higher. Former Bush Jr. administration official and investment banker Catherine Austin Fitts says, were a digital ID/CBDC system in place, elites would even have the power to “take your children.”
Of the 2024 presidential candidates, none has come out more strongly against the new creeping totalitarianism than RFK Jr., who decries the new technologies as reverting society to “feudal serfdom.”
Neel Kashkari, the President of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, says CBDCs are no better than Venmo unless the objective is to monitor every financial transaction and impose taxes directly on customer accounts:
Above: Canadian 2022 anti-COVID vaccine mandate truckers convoy
Two years after Canadian truckers protested mandates for vaccines whose safety and effectiveness are now hotly debated, facial recognition technology is being quietly rolled out, without opposition from Congress, which would have allowed World Economic Forum “Young Global Leader” Justin Trudeau to shut down the truckers’ and supporters’ bank accounts with the flip of a switch in 2022.
The WEF, an unelected billionaire’s club founded by Klaus Schwab, has made no secret of its desire for totalitarian controls in America and across the planet. In his book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Schwab wrote:
“Any package, pallet or container can now be equipped with a sensor, transmitter or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag that allows a company to track where it is as it moves through the supply chain—how it is performing, how it is being used, and so on….In the near future, similar monitoring systems will also be applied to the movement and tracking of people.”
As it were, Trudeau was forced to undertake the cumbersome legal process of declaring a “state of emergency,” then obtaining court orders to unleash police action on protesters’ finances. Not only the truckers, but anyone who had donated to the truckers, or who were seen in the vicinity giving them food, or who donated to their wildly popular GoFundMe page.
Trudeau was road-testing a new form of totalitarian controls beyond old-fashioned police head-busting, which also was deployed, in the name of “protecting public health” with vaccines which are now under fire in many nations’ parliaments, in lawsuits, and from thousands of censored doctors and scientists.
Now the Department of Homeland Security TSA is officially discriminating between people who surrender personal biometric data such as face recognition video selfies, and people who have thus far declined. The technology was pioneered by Bill Gates and his foundation and is promoted as a kind-hearted effort to extend “inclusivity” to poor people who cannot open bank accounts, or avail themselves of government services.
Unreported in the mainstream media, in March and April of 2020 Gates funded the British professor, Neil Ferguson, who wrote the paper, “Report 9,” on which governments based “lockdown” decrees. Also unreported, Gates was a key funder of the so-called WHO Solidarity Trials, which overdosed COVID patients with hydroxychloroquine in order to show that the drug was useless or worse in the treatment of COVID. This in turn paved the way for hasty FDA approval of the mRNA vaccines.
There has been no outcry demanding digital ID, as people have been living without bank accounts, and have been receiving government services around the world just fine in the past.
What universal facial recognition-based digital ID would be very good at, however, is identifying troublemakers, i.e. protesters of any ilk, and shutting them off without a penny with no need for messy court orders. That is because such IDs will eventually link to everything, if we allow it, including bank accounts.
The system would hand the Justin Trudeaus of the world their wildest dream.
“The U.S Transportation Security Administration is advancing face biometrics checks for members of its PreCheck program in partnership with airlines.
The implications of the new TSA PreCheck Touchless ID service for Clear and its membership-based airport biometrics service are unclear.
Delta and United Airlines are each piloting processes to replace boarding pass and physical ID document checks with face biometrics
United supports PreCheck Touchless ID for bag drops at O’Hare International in Chicago, and for security checks at O’Hare and Los Angeles International (LAX). Passengers can opt into the process by submitting selfie biometrics through United’s mobile app.”…The agency has expanded its acceptance of mobile driver’s licenses and other forms of digital ID, and intends to go further this year.
TSA is an agency of the Department of Homeland Security.
Above image, protester in Hong Kong, 2019, cutting down “smart” lamp post containing facial recognition cameras (source)
In 2020, after the World Health Organization’s declaration of a COVID pandemic, Bill Gates began promoting digital ID systems, and praised India as a leader in deploying the technology.
Gates said:
“…the cost of bank branches and paperwork it’s just too high but fortunately starting with countries like kenya and more recently…india we see that you can have digital financial inclusion…
so the role of the Gates Foundation as an advocate for those who don’t have access today is to make sure there’s technology and standards including open source work uh that we’re providing through the financial switch which is called mojo loop and through the digital identity system which is extremely valuable not just for financial activities but for health and voting and education…there isn’t going to be a one-size-fits-all solution what is the role that you see the private sector playing in being able to collaborate with different governments to ensure that we move forward well once you have the digital money system…”
The “digital money system” of which Gates was speaking is the other piece of the totalitarian nightmare being contemplated by the US government, which would be tied to a universal digital ID, Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
CBDC would replace all cash and private bank accounts with a system of debits and credits run by the Federal Reserve, which could then be linked to such abominations as a “social credit score,” such as the Chinese government maintains on almost all its citizens. In China social credit scores determine all facets of daily life, such as which schools one can attend, how far one can travel, what one can buy, and where one can go.
People who are determined to be engaging in “anti-social” behavior, such as the Canadian truckers protesting COVID vaccine mandates, can find their access to their own digital “money” summarily suspended, and left to starve.
Below: Digital ID pilot project created by Microsoft, of which Bill Gates is the founder (source)
Bill Gates promotes digital ID as necessary for “inclusion”
Among the states, California is forging ahead with a “federated” digital ID platform, which could be required to access any state government services such as unemployment benefits or even required to obtain state income tax refunds. Federated means it would eventually tie into a nationwide, universal system.
Below: Home page for State of California digital ID efforts (source)
“The World Bank and other international organizations must immediately stop any and all activities that promote harmful models of digital identification systems (digital ID) anywhere in the world.
Through an open letter, Access Now, Privacy International, NYU researchers, and other civil society organizations are calling on the World Bank to cease supporting unchecked digital ID systems that enable surveillance, exclusion, and discrimination.”
And of the sure-to-be-linked CBDC system, none other than the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, warns of CBDC’s danger to democracy. Kashkari says CBDC would allow the federal government to “monitor every one of your transactions.”
Says Kashkari:
“I get why China would be interested. Why would the American people be for that?”
The stakes of allowing China-style totalitarianism to take hold could not be higher. Former Bush Jr. administration official and investment banker Catherine Austin Fitts says, were a digital ID/CBDC system in place, elites would even have the power to “take your children.”
Of the 2024 presidential candidates, none has come out more strongly against the new creeping totalitarianism than RFK Jr., who decries the new technologies as reverting society to “feudal serfdom.”
Neel Kashkari, the President of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, says CBDCs are no better than Venmo unless the objective is to monitor every financial transaction and impose taxes directly on customer accounts:
Coronavirus News 
