[Breaking Urgent Interview with Former Chief Science Officer and VP at Pfizer, on mRNA Injections: “Governments “Lying” Because “They’re going to kill you and your family.”“]
Meeting with an eerie silence in the US media and government, despite their purported concern for public health, this month the Quebec health authority issued a ban on masks of a type that are widely sold around the world. The masks contain a material called graphene, which studies have shown can cause cellular lung damage. The brand withdrawn is from China, but the material they are made from is used by many different makers.
Government concern for public health is behind the present relentless coercion towards what amounts to injection of experimental biological agents, made by Pfizer and Moderna.
The Canadian national news agency the CBC reported on March 26, 2021 in “Potentially toxic masks distributed in schools and daycares in Quebec”:
“One model of mask distributed to Quebec schools and daycares may be dangerous for the lungs as they could contain a potentially toxic material, according to a directive sent out by the provincial government on Friday…”
Graphene is nanotechnology material.
The CBC writes:
“Health Canada conducted a preliminary risk assessment which revealed a potential for early lung damage associated with inhalation of microscopic graphene particles. Graphene…can be harmful to lungs when inhaled and can cause long-term health problems.”
It is not known how many of the masks are already in circulation, storage, or use in the US and around the world.
Earlier this year Dr. Anthony Fauci famously doubled down on masks by recommending people wear double masks.
COVID is a disease which, in frail elderly and other vulnerable people, attacks the lungs. Lung health is a key factor to survival.
Fauci recently urged that 130,000 lives could be saved by everyone wearing masks. The study came out of the UW’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Below: Widely Available Models of Masks Containing Graphene
In a 2016 paper “Toxicology of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials,” researchers found:
“…studies indicate that the toxicity of graphene is dependent on the complex interplay of several physiochemical properties such as shape, size, oxidative state, functional groups, dispersion state, synthesis methods, route and dose of administration, and exposure times (emphasis added.)”
In a 2013 Brown University reported in the article “Jagged graphene can slice into cell membranes”:
“Researchers from Brown University have shown how tiny graphene microsheets — ultra-thin materials with a number of commercial applications — could be big trouble for human cells”
In that study, the researchers said:
“Schinwald et al. reported that graphene nanoplatelets induced granuloma formation and lung inflammation following pharyngeal aspiration in mice. .. Schinwald et al. provide evidence that graphene nanoplatelets are not readily cleared from the lungs and induce release of proinflammatory mediators from macrophages.”
In “Dose, time, and morphology dependent cytotoxicity,” the authors described the effects of exposures measured in days, not months or years:
“Vallabani et. al. investigated the toxicity of graphene oxide using normal human lung cells (BEAS-2B) after 24 and 48 hours of exposure at concentrations between 10–100 µg/ml.”
Scientists Questioning Motives Behind Mass Experimental Injections Over 99.8% Survival Rate Virus
COVID is now known have a recovery rate of 99.98% for under age 50, and 99.4% to 99.8% overall, similar to flu. Although it is frequently compared in the media to the Spanish Flu of 1918, in global deaths per capita it is nowhere near, and more similar to the 1957 and 1968 flu pandemics, which few in the general population even knew about and never prompted talk of masks or lockkdowns.
As voices from both the left and the right loudly denounce the idea of “vaccine passports,” which would link almost every person on the planet to a centralized database, doctors and scientists of stature are accusing governments of a massive campaign of “demonstrably false” misinformation, in order to force all persons into accepting experimental injections.
From Naomi Wolf, the author of “Disaster Capitalism,” to the ACLU, Dr. Mercola, and Tucker Carlson, all questioned what are misnamed as “vaccines,” the Pfizer and Moderna shots which both have two full years of clinical safety trials scheduled in their protocols submitted to the FDA, and are in use only as a result of an FDA grant of “emergency use authorization.”
Below: Page from Pfizer clinical trials protocol submitted to FDA, showing two-year safety and efficacy trials for experimental virus protection. Source
Former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, Dr. Mike Yeadon, says:
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines.”
“You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects,”
Pfizer and Moderna state there is no evidence of links between over 1,600 deaths reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), and the injections. But one-third of the deaths were within 48 hours of the injections, in many healthy adults reporting no pre-existing conditions.
In December, British health officials warned people with food allergies not to take the Pfizer experimental vaccine injection, only to later reverse its position, so that it “aligns” with the American one, without citing any new science.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, a critic of the COVID injections, asks “in how many industries would these products even still be on the market?”
The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to market is 10 years.
Dr. Yeadon and others worry that there is no long-term data on the safety of mRNA technology in humans. The data shows that when tested in animals, mRNA technology has almost always resulted in test animals gravely ill or dying in time-frames of six to 12 months.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nephew of the slain president and founder of Children’s Health Defense, writes:
“Scientists first attempted to develop coronavirus vaccines after China’s 2002 SARS-CoV outbreak. Teams of US & foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs. Researchers had seen this same “enhanced immune response” during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine tests in the 1960s. Two children died.”
Doctors such as Dr. Ryan Cole say that the risk-taking over inadequately animal-tested injections is especially unnecessary because now it is argued by many doctors, even though it is still suppressed by the FDA, that Ivermectin is safe and reduces COVID mortality by 70%. But, Ryan notes, FDA “emergency use authorization” depends, legally, on there being no alternative treatment available for COVID, and that the NIH, a US government agency, partly owns the patent for the Moderna injection, presenting a grave conflict of interest.
One notable physician to take up ivermectin’s cause is Yale School of Medicine Professor and renowned cancer researcher Dr. Alessandro Santin.
Dr. Ryan Cole says that, by suppressing the use of Ivermectin, the FDA has “blood on the hands.”
In Florida and Texas, governors have already issued executive orders against “vaccine passports.” In Massachusetts, legislation is under deliberation which would prohibit coercive medical procedures and medical discrimination.
In Israel, citizens have filed a lawsuit at the International Criminal Court for Crimes Against Humanity for Israel’s push to force the experimental injections on everyone.
Israeli Citizens Call for Help Against New “Medical Apartheid” (view at Bitchute)
Former Pfizer VP: “They’re going to kill you and your family.”
In one of his most recent and most remarkable interviews, Dr. Yeadon, the former Pfizer VP and Chief Science Officer who has always shunned “conspiracy theories,” expressed his reluctant conclusion, based on what he says is a massive campaign of “demonstrably false” propaganda by governments, media, and the medical establishment, that elites are now in the process of attempting mass murder and totalitarian social control.
The role of the media in perpetuating the “panic porn” as liberal comedian Bill Maher regularly calls it, has been criticized from both left and right. In an expose’ on CNN a Project Veritas reporter went undercover and recorded CNN technical director Charlie Chester admitting to all manner of journalistic bias, saying:
“COVID? Gangbusters with ratings, right? Which is why we [CNN] constantly have the [COVID] death toll on the side.”
“Why is my government lying to me?’ Because ‘they are going to kill you.’ [And if you recognize that our governments are involved in a major verifiable lie], don’t just turn your computer off and go to supper. Stop. Look out the window, and think, ‘why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?’ Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.
“The eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you. I have no idea what it will actually be, but it won’t be a vaccine because you don’t need one. And it won’t kill you on the end of the needle because you would spot that.
“It could be something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at various times between vaccination and the event, it will be plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on in the world at that time, in the context of which your demise, or that of your children will look normal.
“That’s what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world’s population. And I think that’s what they’re doing.”
Remarkably, Dr. Anthony Fauci last year told a congressional committee:
“I must warn that there is a possibility of negative consequences where certain vaccines can actually enhance the negative effect of the infection,”
As strange, as if to prepare the public for the next message, last month Biden and Fauci said they shared a sense of “impending doom.”
Completing a triad of elite prognostications of death for millions, of course, is Bill Gates weird, grinning remark last year that there will be more pandemics, and the next one “WILL get attention.”
Below: Renown microbiologist, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, impassioned plea to governments to halt mass “vaccinations” (VIEW HERE AT BITCHUTE)
Below: COVID Facts and Statistics
Below: Click for larger image
Below: click for larger image