[Update: Dr. Malone spoke recently on the Tucker Carlson Show (at 8 minutes)]
Directly contradicting Dr. Fauci’s, the FDA’s, and the media and medical establishment’s relentless campaign to inject as many Americans as possible with what are, at least until the end of 2022, officially experimental drugs, the inventor of the mRNA core technology has sounded the alarm on new data showing the vaccines are “dangerous,” with possible long-term effects which can only be guessed at.
Dr. Robert Malone, in essence, all but indicated that, given the new data, the mRNA injections are a ticking time bomb.
In a key exchange in the interview, Dr. Malone addressed a recent Japanese study which shows that the mRNA shot does not work in the manner intended. All new drugs have typically undergone three to six years of animal trials. The scientists agree that the public has been placed in “danger” by the injections.
The scientists addressed grave concerns that the “spike protein,” circulates throughout the body and accumulates in organs, bones, and especially, ovaries.
Introducing the topic, Dr. Bret Weinstein said (RUSH TRANSCRIPT OF FULL INTERVIEW VIDEO BELOW, DR. MALONE IS “SPEAKER 3”):
“So I must say that this is a difficult topic for us to address. We all, I believe, are agreed that something very serious is afoot and the public is largely unaware that they have been placed into a kind of danger. And we also know that there’s a great deal of stigma directed at those who would explore these dangers.”
“They did not believe the spike was biologically active. That was the big mystery.”
“Now know the spike protein is very dangerous there. It is violent. We also know so if it was very dangerous, but it did what the
brochure on these vaccines says it should do, which is large in the membrane of the cells that are doing the transcribing, it would be
a lot less destructive, right?”
“I think that’s fair. And you’re right. It’s not just the literature that the the documentation about the vaccine. It’s the prior literature that was put out by the people that developed it that developed these clones. So they were they were aware that there was a risk of Spike being biologically active in having adverse events if it did not stay stuck to the cells that were transected, that got the RNA and made it OK. And and they used a genetic engineering method of putting a trans membrane domain on it to ensure that it stayed anchored and stayed put. And there they did limited, non-clinical studies to say looks like it stays stuck. We engineered it to stay stuck. They did. And they published it. Here’s the thing…Is that that’s generally not good enough in a non-clinical data package…”
“…before we get a product released to use in humans, in the normal situation where we’re not in a rush, we have some really rigorous tests that have to be done in animals. And revealing that spike gets cleaved off of express cells and becomes free is something that absolutely should have been known and understood well before this ever got put in humans.”
Summary of Dr. Malone June 2021 Interview by Discernable (view at Bitchute)
Inventor of mRNA Dr. Robert Malone, Full Interview (view at Bitchute)
For a year now, many doctors and scientists have urged the FDA and governments to proceed with caution, as mRNA technology, according to the inventor Dr. Malone, is a completely novel medical technology, which has never been authorized for general use or for “emergency use,” as the FDA has granted.
In December, a former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, and a German physician, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, called for a halt to all mass vaccinations and human clinical trials of the Pfizer and Moderna injections, based on safety concerns.
Multiple groups of doctors and scientists have also called for a halt to the human experimentation, which based on short term human trials last year, is being called “safe and effective.” The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to market is 10 years, including 3 to 6 years of animal trials. (Links to doctors’ calls for halts, partial list: 1, 2, 3, 4.)
The number of deaths possibly related to the mRNA injections made by Pfizer and Moderna is now over 12,000 in the US, approximately one-third of them within 48 hours of receiving the shots, in one sample. Although the pharma companies deny any causal relation, requests for medical reports and autopsies to confirm this have been ignored.
Most drug trials are halted after 25 to 50 possibly related deaths, as a swine flu vaccine was in 1976. The fastest vaccine ever developed was for mumps, in the 1960s, which took four years before general use.
In December the British health authority warned people with food allergies not to take the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 experimental vaccine injection, warning of “anaphylactoid reactions.”
On June 2 the Israeli Ministry of Health announced a “probable link” between the Pfizer injection and inflammation of the heart in young males. Moderna’s and Pfizer’s own fact sheets say that “many” in the population with other allergies “should not” take the mRNA injections.
Nevertheless, these are never mentioned in the daily drive by news anchors and politicians to drive every person to take the shots, up to and including threats of job loss and social shunning. Most recently, a vicious drive is on to blame illnesses on people who decline the shots. But why would anyone trust corporations with no scruples against experimenting for safety on six-month-old babies, and insanely calling them willing “participants?” Why would anyone trust the FDA, and the US government, which allow it?
Fox News’ Ingraham Slams 2010 Rockefeller “Scenario” for Universal Biochip ID
The blockbuster remarks from the inventor of mRNA technology take place as a corner of the mainstream media reveals that in 2010, a think tank for the Rockefeller family described a scenario in which an end goal is universal biometric IDs.
Fox News’ Laura Ingraham highlighted a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,” which foresaw a pandemic much like COVID in the US, in which masks and “social distancing” became part of the repertoire of government powers. The report predicted approvingly:
“Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and
their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens…”
Fox News’ Laura Ingraham Calls Out Rockefeller Foundation on 2010 Lockdown, Biometric ID Blueprint (view at Bitchute)
In October 2020, the Rockefeller partnered with the World Economic Forum, an elite international business club founded by Klaus Schwab, consisting of the world’s richest people and most powerful and connected corporations, and the two hatched a future scenario called the Commons Project, in which in was ascertained, in “Rebuilding Trust for International Travel”:
“the world needs a unified digital infrastructure and health trust framework, where health data can be shared securely across borders…”
An international “unified digital infrastructure…framework” is nothing less than an all-seeing, world database of almost all humans.
Klaus Schwab is the author of the book “The Great Reset,” which foresees a future of purely digital currency, human inter-linkeage with machines and artificial intelligence, and industrial automation on a scale never seen before. Former Texas Congressman Ron Paul wrote on January 4th in “Oppression… The ‘Great Reset’ is about Expanding Government Power and Suppressing Liberty”:
“World Economic Forum Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab has proposed using the overreaction to coronavirus to launch a worldwide “Great Reset.” This Great Reset is about expanding government power and suppressing liberty worldwide…The Great Reset will dramatically expand the surveillance state via real-time tracking. It will also mandate that people receive digital certificates in order to travel and even technology implanted in their bodies to monitor them.”
As has become typical, major media “debunks,” from organizations owned by the same people possibly making these plans, utilize standard propaganda “straw man” techniques which assert that the documents do not “prove” dire intent, when no one said they did. Lack of proof, however, is not lack of evidence.
Strategic Connections, Strategic LIes
Ingraham’s willingness to probe “behind the curtain,” after what has turned out to be, in the words of former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, a campaign of “demonstrable” lies, is accompanied by a solid paper trail of links between key influencers of the international response to COVID, and technologies which will be needed to accomplish “The Great Reset.” These “lies,” an unusually strong word for the soft-spoken Dr. Yeadon, have been apparently agreed upon at the highest levels and relentlessly promulgated by governments, the medical establishment, and the media.
“in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything…”
Dr. Yeadon is talking about UK, but he says the lies are coordinated across governments. On one subject, “variants,” he says:
“There was no possibility at all, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous]…“Nevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are saying that they are. They’re lying. Well, why would you do that?”
Below: Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer and VP at Pfizer, respiratory illnesses division
Some other lies:
- No Other Remedies for COVID But “Vaccines”
Evidence continues to build that remedies were available which might have reduced COVID deaths by 70%. This is according to some of the most eminent doctors in the world, who nevertheless lost their Twitter accounts in a concerted push to deny the sick an excellent chance of recovery, as the FDA and Big Tech suppressed the information. Why?
Possibly because besides raising the death count, if a crisis is what you want to create, FDA “emergency use authorization (EUA)” rules state that EUA can only be granted if there is no other safe and effective remedy.
Just one example will suffice to show that Fauci, the medical establishment, WHO, the FDA, and the media all colluded to lie about COVID remedies. This was the effort to associate hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) – a key ingredient in some protocols – with heart arrhythmia.
In May 2020, Fauci said that not only was there no evidence that showed the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine was effective at treating COVID-19, at least not that met his “gold standard,” but that it could actually be harmful, causing heart problems. Fauci said:
“There was suspicion of that for a while, but as data comes in, it becomes more clear,”
Fauci never said where he got this idea. But a week later, two of the world’s most prestigious medical journals, The Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine, the latter affiliated with Harvard, were forced to yank two studies which concluded that HCQ during the treatment of COVID could be bad for the heart. Thanks to a letter by 200 doctors and scientists challenging one of the studies, it was found that both were based on faked data.
Then in August 2020, the NIH published a study which seemed aimed at exploring where else Fauci would get such an idea about HCQ and heart arrhythmia. But it came up dry. In fact, not only did the science literature indicate that HCQ was not dangerous to the heart, it seemed to indicate that it was actually protective of it.
There was one study, however, which did come to the “dangerous” conclusion. It was a Brazilian study, which gave subjects up to six times maximum recommended dose of HCQ, in the form of Plaquenil, the popular and common malaria drug with a 60 year safety record.
In the faulty Brazilian trial, as much as 1200 mg a day for 10 days, or 12,000 mg were being administered to COVID patients. The upper-end dose for Plaquenil (HCQ) for the treatment of malaria is 2,000 mg, according to directions which read:
“Adults: 800 mg followed by 400 mg at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the initial dose.“
No surprise,then, that heart palpitations would result.
On the other side, over 6,000 doctors around the world, and dozens of studies, were telling Fauci another story, that HCQ, used in the correct manner, saved lives.
Below: HCQ vs. Non-HCQ Countries Source: HCQTrial.com
Addressing the exposed and retracted Lancet and NEJM studies, the respected magazine Science found that the web is still rife with articles, even in respected medical journals, which maintain the conclusion that HCQ is dangerous, based on references to the disgraced articles.
Fauci and the WHO/FDA’s warnings against HCQ and Ivermectin stand to this day.
- Worst Pandemic Since the Spanish Flu
Not even close. The real surprise is that, worldwide, there have been no “excess deaths,” that is, any more deaths than would have been expected in ordinary times. That does not mean there were no excess deaths anywhere. With only 4% of the world’s population, the US, with one of the most advanced medical infrastructures in the world, suffered 16% of the deaths attributed to COVID as of June 2021. About 20% of those, according to a University of Virginia-Yale joint study, can be attributed to the effects of lockdowns such as deferred critical medical care and “deaths of despair” such as opiod overdoses and suicides.
In addition, it is questionable if the number of deaths in the US would have taken off so sharply had governors of some densely populated states not enforced a policy of placing thousands of COVID patients into nursing homes. Finally, countries in which there were excess deaths, a relatively small number of advanced Western, mostly NATO, countries: Italy, France, UK, Poland, Spain, Portugal, Bulgaria, Hungary, and of course, the US, almost all enforced a policy of suppressing HCQ and Ivermectin as cheap, safe remedies.
Although there were no excess deaths on average globally, in the US there were just over 10% more deaths than expected in an ordinary year, more than most of the world’s poorest and most medically backwards countries.
Within the US, comparisons to the Spanish Flu constantly made in the media were dishonest. Although 600,000 dead now (if the numbers are to be believed, another story) is comparable to 675,000 in the Spanish Flu, this neglects that the US population was much smaller in 1918. About a third of what it is now. In per-capita terms, the Spanish Flu death toll was far closer to the 1957 and 1968 flu pandemics. But these were never mentioned in the media, nor at those times was there ever any talk of masks or lockdowns.
World pandemic Deaths, Historic (click for larger image)
- Inflated Death Numbers –
The US COVID pandemic was the first in the US in which death counting conventions allowed anyone who died “with COVID” to be counted as having died “of COVID.” These were the words of White House Coronavirus Task Force advisor Dr. Deborah Birx. One methodical study of nearly 3,000 death certificates found that 40% of them were mislabeled as COVID. Last May, Dr. Deborah Birx suggested that COVID deaths were being overcounted by 25%, or 150,000 people by today.
The list goes on, too long to recount all of it here. It is recommended that the reader peruse the articles in this website.
Elites Like Gates Financed Critical Components of Lockdowns and “Great Reset”
As for connections between elite players, key aspect of the COVID response, and the technologies needed to bring on “The Great Reset,” we know:
Without the crisis atmosphere, even though COVID is a 99.8% survival rate virus, any drive toward the totalitarian society of coerced vaccines, biometric passports, and constant “health surveillance” would be stillborn.
- A significant part of that crisis atmosphere was created by a paper by Prof. Neil Ferguson, of Imperial College, who sold the world on “lockdowns” and social distancing, and which now has been thoroughly discredited. That paper was entitled “Report 9 – Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand.” In a strange coincidence, none other than Bill Gates, one of the most heavily invested people in the mass vaccination agenda in the world, funded Ferguson and gave his MCR Centre for Global and Infectious Diseases $8 million last March and April.
- The FDA, which declares when vaccines are “safe,” owes half its annual budget to the pharmaceuticals industry.
- In a remarkable conflict of interest, the World Health Organization, which guides pandemic response from policy on remedies such as Ivermectin to COVID testing, receives 10% to 13% of its funding, as much as the entire US donation, from one man, Bill Gates. who has been heavily invested in vaccine companies, including Pfizer and Moderna, for many years. Although Gates carefully cultivates the image of a late-life billionaire generously giving much of his fortune away, Gates’ personal net worth has climbed steadily in line with his giving.
Below source: The Nation, “Bill Gates’s Charity Paradox“
- “Fact-check” websites which relentlessly keep the official COVID narrative on track, such as PolitiFact.com and FactCheck.org, coincidentally receive large funding from Gates through their parent organizations the Poynter Institute, and the Annenberg Foundation. In other words, the “fact checkers” ruthlessly suppressing HCQ and Iverectin are paid for by the same people interested in widespread vaccination being seen as the only solution.
- Last year Fauci said that if everyone in the country wore masks consistently, 130,000 lives could be saved. The number for this statement came out of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which is heavily funded by Bill Gates.
- A huge, unreported scandal in the US has been that US health authorities have been actively promoting the long-term wearing of masks which are known to cause lung-damage due to containing the nano-material graphene. These have been banned in Canada.
Like Fauci, Gates, who is not a scientist and did not even graduate from college, has an uncanny knack for predicting pandemics. saying in 2018, ” if history has taught us anything, it’s that there will be another deadly global pandemic.” In 2017 Fauci said with great certainty that there was “No doubt” Trump would face a surprise infectious disease outbreak.
Given the near certainty now that the virus was man-made, and that Fauci played no small part in funding the gain-of-function research which makes viruses more transmittable, it might behoove the world to ask Fauci if his prescience was informed by inside knowledge.
Gates for his part keeps making predictions, and in December spoke as if COVID was just a dress rehearsal. Gates said, with an unseemly smirk, that there will soon be another pandemic, which “this time,” “WILL get attention.”
Below: 24 Month Timeline for Moderna Safety and Efficacy Human Trials, Through End of 2022 (source: Moderna human clinical trials protocol filed with FDA)
Below: Moderna protocol describing 2 years of study for medically attended adverse events, through end of 2022 (source)