It’s Over! Safe Remedies Obviate Need for Experimental Vaccines, Now It’s Murder

February 7, 2021 Publius 5 Comments

Debbie Maimon of the respected Orthodox Jewish newspaper Yated Neeman writes on Feb. 3rd:

“For the second time in a month, strong positions taken against early outpatient drug treatment for Covid-19 by federal agencies and the medical establishment have quietly been withdrawn. This suggests a long-awaited turning point in the battle against the disease, many believe. Three weeks ago, the NIH withdrew its opposition to “wonder-drug” ivermectin as a treatment for both outpatient and hospitalized Covid patients.”

Ms. Maimon notes the role played by the US Senate Homeland Security hearings, led by Senator Ron Johnsonn (R-WI), in giving physicians the right to determine whether to use the drug in their treatment of Covid-19 patients.

The NIH has upgraded their recommendation on ivermectin, making it an option for use in COVID-19.

Newswise reports:

“This new designation upgraded the status of ivermectin from “against” to “neither for nor against”, which is the same recommendation given to monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma, both widely used across the nation.”

The new policy, which is still heavily suppressed in the Google and Yahoo search engines making it nearly impossible to find unless one is a skilled researcher, follows another whisper-quiet change in policy toward hydroxychloroquine (HCQ,) reflected by the republication at the NIH scientific repository of the paper “Antimalarials as Antivirals for COVID-19: Believe it or Not!”

This is in contrast to the concerted push for the use of still officially experimental stage vaccines, given under an FDA “emergency use authorization,” which according to the FDA may be used only when:

“when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives”

Independent journalist David DeGraw, author of the 2010 essay “The Economic Elite Vs. The People ~ Original 99% Movement Call to Action,” which was credited with sparking the Occupy Wall Street movement, penned a detailed overview of doctors and scientists praising the properties of Ivermectin, a safe anti-parasitic used sine the Seventies, in the treatment of COVID.

Featured in DeGraw’s article is nternationally renowned physician and Australia’s Centre for Digestive Disease (CDD) Medical Director Thomas Borody, who has four FDA approved drugs and is famous for developing a triple therapy cure for peptic ulcers, which saved millions of people worldwide, said back in September:

“Ivermectin treatment ‘could bring us all together by Christmas'”

This is in addition to the publication this January, unreported in major media, of a Hackensack Meridian Health, NJ, study concluding that, after a year of bitter suppression of success around the world with HCQ, patients with mild symptoms of the virus who received HCQ are “significantly less likely to end up in the hospital.”

This is long after Dr. Harvey Risch, of the Yale School of Public Medicine, said, to mockery and near-libel, that judicious use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ,) in precise protocols, could have saved “75,000 to 100,000 Lives.” (HCQ studies)

The soft-spoken Dr. Risch was not cowed, and came out with guns blazing on an even more controversial topic, if that is possible, the role of Dr. Anthony Fauci in using his clout as a high official in the past to suppress life-saving treatments for AIDS in the Eighties.

On Fox News last night (Sunday, August 23, 2020) on the Mark Levin show, Dr. Risch said:

“The FDA … has a history of not making science-based, rational-based, decisions about its approvals.

This was started most noticeably in 1987, when people with AIDS in New York City were dying of what is called pneumocystis pneumonia, PCP.

The clinical experience then had been amassed of a large number of cases who were prevented from dying by use of the antibiotic bacterium.

This is (another case where) even then there was a generic medication and cheap.

And activists obtained a meeting with Dr. Fauci and 15 of his selected scientists at the NIH, and asked Dr. Fauci just to make guidelines to physicians that they consider using bactrim to treat preventively AIDS people so that they wouldn’t die of this pneumonia.

Dr. Fauci refused.

He said, ‘I want randomized controlled blinded trial evidence. That’s my gold standard – that or nothing.’

The activists left and the NIH did not fund any randomized trials. They raised money themselves from their own AIDS patients to collect the data to do a randomized trial.

But it took them 2 years. They came back to Dr. Fauci.

During those 2 years, the FDA approved AZT as a treatment for AIDS.

AZT works, but not completely, it needs other medications as well.

During the two years that it took them to get this data to come back to Dr. Fauci to support using bactrim, 17,000 people with AIDS died because of Dr. Fauci’s insistence on not allowing even a statement supporting consideration of the use.

This has gone on before.”

The Forced Experimental Vaccine Program Unravels

In contrast to the long-established and known safety of Ivermectin and HCQ, many doctors and scientists are warning of the long-term dangers of experimental COVID vaccines, most notably from immune system confusion at encountering the wild, mutated virus in later months or years.

In an April 2020 scientific publication, “Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus,” the authors wrote of previous attempts to develop coronavirus vaccines:

“Evaluations of an inactivated whole virus vaccine in ferrets and nonhuman primates and a virus-like-particle vaccine in mice induced protection against infection but challenged animals exhibited an immunopathologic-type lung disease….

These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced.”

Some doctors and scientists are warning of a coming mass casualty event resulting from vaccinations which will be blamed on a new strain of COVID, and used to further a mandatory injection agenda.

Now with officially recorded CDC possible vaccine-related deaths, as of Jan. 29, hitting 501 deaths. 10,748 reported injuries, and 153 permanent disabilities, the question may be asked, why continue to risk what amount to experimental trials on humans, some not fully aware that they are being experimented on?

The fact remains that the vaccines are currently only allowed because the FDA has issued an EUA, and “emergency use authorization,” and are still not approved for general public use.

Contrasted to two of the safest over-the-counter drugs in the world, why would anyone chose to be a guinea pig?

Moreover, when one asks why studies would be designed for HCQ to appear dangerous, one must wonder what kind of larger deception is in progress. One study cited by the FDA which showed that HCQ may cause heart side effects was conducted by administering many times the recommended dose, as much as 1200 mg a day for 10 days.

The upper-end dose for Plaquenil (HCQ) for the treatment of malaria (not the smaller prevention dose) is, according to directions:

Adults: 800 mg followed by 400 mg at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the initial dose.

This is the study which prompted the FDA to issue its warning over the use of HCQ.

From this point on, the media and medical establishment’s withholding of information on safe, life-saving treatments must be considered nothing short of accomplice to murder.